A Method of Teaching Genetics Based on the Use of Genotoxic Studies
Anahtar Kelimeler:
genetic education, genotoxicity, mutation, Ames test, SalmonellaÖzet
The purpose of this study is to give students the opportunity to develop their genetic knowledge, linking them with important problems of society. Interactive research-based teaching methods are widely used in genetic education. This allows you to determine the degree of interest of the student in the subject. A special place in teaching genetics is occupied by laboratory work. Laboratory work arouses interest, allowing students to engage in science using research methods. Modern students should learn how to use scientific models, calculate appropriate mathematical approaches and statistics to solve problems, as well as manage and integrate data. Given the importance of genetics for society, in this article we decided to focus on hemotoxins, an urgent problem at the present time. Having developed the Ames test, one of the test systems for determining genotoxicity, we focused on the features of teaching genetics. Laboratory experience helps students to control the influence of the surrounding world from hemotoxins, various factors on the processes of pollution, mutation, inheritance and, conducting the experiment, to understand mistakes, interpret the data obtained, draw the right conclusions. In this regard, interactive methods were used to consolidate the theoretical knowledge of students in the form of practice: cumulative brainstorming, minute reflection.
Referanslar
ПАЙДАЛАНЫЛҒАН ӘДЕБИЕТТЕР ТІЗІМІ
Etobro A.B., Banioko S.O. Misconceptions of genetics concepts among pre-service teachers // Global Journal of Educational Research. – 2017. – Vol. 16. – №2. – P. 121–128. 2. Зеленский Г.Л., Зеленская О.В. Десять лет, которые изменили биологический мир (к вопросу истории генетики) // Научный журнал КубГАУ. – 2010. – №63(09). – С. 226–232.
Radford A., Bird-Stewart J.A. Teaching genetics in schools // Journal of Biological Education. – 1982. – Vol. 16. – №3. – P. 177–180. 4. Иманкулова С.К., Кенжебаева З.С., Шалабаев К.И. Роль генетического образования как ключевого звена подготовки специалистов биологов // Фундаментальные исследования. – 2012. – №9-2. – С. 294–299. 5. Седых Т.А. и др. Современное генетическое образование: насколько оно отвечает запросам студентов? // Высшее образование в России. – 2022. – №3. – С. 124–139.
Chattopadhyay A. Understanding of mitosis and meiosis in higher secondary students of Northeast India and the implications for genetics education // Education. – 2012. – Vol. 2. – №3. – P. 41–47.
Ottander C., Grelsson G. Laboratory work: the teachers' perspective // Journal of Biological Education. – 2006. – Vol. 40. – №3. – P. 113–118. 8. Goodson-Greg N., Di Stasio E.A. The invention of the Ames test as a quantitative laboratory combining classical and molecular genetics // Genetics. – 2009. – Vol. 181. – №1. – P. 23–31.
Steiblen G., van Benthem J., Johnson G. Strategies in genotoxicology: acceptance of innovative scientific methods in a regulatory context and from an industrial perspective // Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. – 2020. – Vol. 853. – P. 503171. 10. Абилев С., Глазер В. Мутагенез с основами генотоксикологии: учебное пасобие. – М.: Нестор-История, 2015. – С.13–14. 11. Zeiger E. The Test that Changed the World: The Ames Test and Chemicals Regulation // Mutation research / Genetic toxicology and ecological mutagenesis. – 2019. – Vol. 841. – P. 43–48. 12. Колясникова Н.Л. Проблемы генетической безопасности: учебное пособие. – Пермь: ИПЦ «Прокростъ», 2019. – 20 c.
Умиралиева Б.K., Сапарбаева З.A. Сабақтың тиімділігін арттыратын 370 әдіс+саралаудың 100 тәсілі: әдістемелік нұсқаулық. – Шымкент: «Нұрдана-LTD» баспасы, 2018. – 181 б.
REFERENCES
Etobro A.B., Banioko S.O. Misconceptions of genetics concepts among pre-service teachers // Global Journal of Educational Research. – 2017. – Vol. 16. – №2. – P. 121–128. 2. Zelenskiy G.L., Zelenskaia O.V. Desiat let, kotorye izmenili biologicheskiy mir (k voprosu istorii genetiki) [Ten years that changed the biological world (to the question of the history of genetics)] // Nauchnyi jurnal KubGAU. – 2010. – №63(09). – S. 226–232. [in Russian]
Radford A., Bird-Stewart J.A. Teaching genetics in schools // Journal of Biological Education. – 1982. – Vol. 16. – №3. – P. 177–180. [in English] 4. Imankulova S.K., Kenjebaeva Z.S., Shalabaev K.I. Rol geneticheskogo obrazovaniia kak kliuchevogo zvena podgotovki specialistov biologov [The role of genetic education as a key link in the training of biologists] // Fundamentalnye issledovaniia. – 2012. – №9-2. – S. 294–299. [in Kazakh] 5. Sedyh T.A. i dr. Sovremennoe geneticheskoe obrazovanie: naskolko ono otvechaet zaprosam studentov? [Modern genetic education: how much does it meet the needs of students?] // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. – 2022. – №3. – S. 124–139. [in Russian]
Chattopadhyay A. Understanding of mitosis and meiosis in higher secondary students of Northeast India and the implications for genetics education // Education. – 2012. – Vol. 2. – №3. – P. 41–47
Ottander C., Grelsson G. Laboratory work: the teachers' perspective // Journal of Biological Education. – 2006. – Vol. 40. – №3. – P. 113–118. 8. Goodson-Greg N., Di Stasio E.A. The invention of the Ames test as a quantitative laboratory combining classical and molecular genetics // Genetics. – 2009. – Vol. 181. – №1. – P. 23–31.9. Steiblen G., van Benthem J., Johnson G. Strategies in genotoxicology: acceptance of innovative scientific methods in a regulatory context and from an industrial perspective // Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. – 2020. – Vol. 853. – P. 503171. 10. Abilev S., Glazer V. Mutagenez s osnovami genotoksikologii: uchebnoe pasobie [Mutagenesis with the basics of genotoxicology: textbook]. – M.: Nestor-Istoriia, 2015. – S.13–14. [in Russian] 11. Zeiger E. The Test that Changed the World: The Ames Test and Chemicals Regulation // Mutation research / Genetic toxicology and ecological mutagenesis. – 2019. – Vol. 841. – P. 43–48. 12. Koliasnikova N.L. Problemy geneticheskoi bezopasnosti: uchebnoe posobie [Problems of genetic safety: textbook]. – Perm: IPC «Prokrost», 2019. – 20 c. [in Russian]
Umiralieva B.K., Saparbaeva Z.A. Sabaqtyn tiіmdіlіgіn arttyratyn 370 adіs+saralaudyn 100 tasіlі [370 methods that increase the effectiveness of classes+100 levels of differentiation]: adіstemelіk nusqaulyq. – Shymkent: «Nurdana-LTD» baspasy, 2018. – 181 b. [in Kazakh]
