Bilingual Education as a Way to Develop Students' Professional Competencies
26 18
Keywords:
bilingual education, professional-communicative competence, student autonomy, bilingual education, multicultural environment.Abstract
The attitude towards bilingualism in education has completely changed in the contemporary period. The current study shows that bilingualism has a clear advantage, as cumulative research data conducted over the past three decades in various locations around the world shows that people who can develop their linguistic potential receive cognitive, social, personal and economic benefits. In addition to linguistic, academic and cognitive outcomes, bilingual education promotes the absence of prejudice and acceptance of cultural diversity. At the same time, the issue of the development of professional, communicative and intercultural competencies and autonomy in the context of learning in several languages remains a rather acute topic. However, contrary to the concerns expressed due to higher cognitive requirements in bilingual programs, these problems are solved by effective teaching methods and curricula. The quality of teaching is another objective that the educational reform program is aimed at, and quality teaching will be crucial for the success of bilingual education. In addition, the development of appropriate complex and contextualized curricula for both languages is also crucial. It is these two aspects that will be discussed in detail in this article.
References
Сулейменова А.Х., Лазаренко И.А. Билингвальное образование как одна из тенденций языкового развития современного Казахстана // Актуальные проблемы гуманитарных и естественных наук. – 2017. – №12-1. – С. 50–52.
2.Freedman S. A life of learning languages // In E. Todeva, J. Cenoz (Eds.). The multiple realities of multilingualism: Personal narratives and researchers’ perspectives. – Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009. – P. 135–152.
Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective / García O. (Ed.). – Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. – 496 р.
Gibbons P. English Learners, Academic Literacy and Thinking. – Heinemann: Portsmouth, NH, 2009. – 208 р.
Fishman J. Reversing the language shift: theoretical and empirical foundations for helping endangered languages. – Clevedon: Multilingual issues, 2007. – 431 p.
Hornberger N. Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for education policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings // Language in Society. – 2005. – №34(02). – P. 300–302.
Беркимбаев К., Мухамеджанов Б., Нышанова С., Керимбаева Б. Использование интернет-ресурсов при обучении иностранным языкам в вузе // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов, серия Информатизация образования. – 2012. – №2. – C. 98–104.
Benson C. Do we expect too much of bilingual teachers? Bilingual teaching in developing countries // International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. – 2004. – Vol. 7(2). – P. 204–221.
Abykanova et al. Pedagogical Technology: A specific historical approach // Revista san gregorio. – 2021. – №44. – P. 179–185.
Клинг В.И., Сурдина Е.В. Билингвальное обучение: проблемы и перспективы // Мир науки, культуры, образования. – 2019. – №5 (78). – С. 142–144.
Baker C. Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Issues in Applied Linguistics. – №6(1). – Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2006.– 273 р.
Abykanova et al. Interactive Teaching methods as Pedagogical Innovation // Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun. – 2021. – Т. 14. – №05. – P. 171–175.
Салехова Л. Модель билингвального обучения математике // Высшее образование в России. – 2008. – №3. – С. 161–165.
Kenner C. Bilingual families as literacy eco-systems // Early Years. – 2005. – Vol. 25. – №3. – P. 283–298.
Lin A., Man E. Bilingual Education: Southeast Asian perspectives. – Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2009. – 50 р.
Абрамова Н.В., Ессина И.Ю. Инновационные стратегии в билингвальном обучении // Фундаментальные исследования. – 2014. – №6-2. – С. 345–349.
Bialystok C. Literacy: the extension of languages through other means // In: Cooper R., Shohamy E., Walters J. (Eds). New Perspectives and Issues in Educational Language Policy. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001. – Р. 428–442.
Кенжебаева Ж.Е., Кайрлиева Н.Б. Концепт «Молоко» в казахском языке и культуре: лингвокультурологический аспект описания // Наука и жизнь Казахстана. – 2020. – №10/1 (141). – С. 193–198.
REFERENCES
Suleimenova A.H., Lazarenko I.A. Bilingvalnoe obrazovanie kak odna iz tendenciy iazykovogo razvitia sovremennogo Kazahstana [Bilingual education as one of the trends in the language development of modern Kazakhstan] // Aktualnye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. – 2017. – №12-1. – S. 50–52. [in Russian]
2.Freedman S. A life of learning languages // In E. Todeva, J. Cenoz (Eds.). The multiple realities of multilingualism: Personal narratives and researchers’ perspectives. – Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009. – P. 135–152.
Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective / García O. (Ed.). – Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. – 496 r.
Gibbons P. English Learners, Academic Literacy and Thinking. – Heinemann: Portsmouth, NH, 2009. – 208 r.
Fishman J. Reversing the language shift: theoretical and empirical foundations for helping endangered languages. – Clevedon: Multilingual issues, 2007. – 431 p.
Hornberger N. Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for education policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings // Language in Society. – 2005. – №34(02). – P. 300–302.
Berkimbaev K., Muhamedjanov B., Nyshanova S., Kerimbaeva B. Ispolzovanie internet-resursov pri obuchenii inostrannym iazykam v vuze [The use of Internet resources in teaching foreign languages at a university] // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta drujby narodov, seria Informatizacia obrazovania. – 2012. – №2. – C. 98–104. [in Russian]
Benson C. Do we expect too much of bilingual teachers? Bilingual teaching in developing countries // International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. – 2004. – Vol. 7(2). – P. 204–221.
Abykanova et al. Pedagogical Technology: A specific historical approach // Revista san gregorio. – 2021. – №44. – P. 179–185.
Kling V.I., Surdina E.V. Bilingvalnoe obuchenie: problemy i perspektivy [Bilingual education: problems and prospects] // Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovania. – 2019. – №5 (78). – S. 142–144. [in Russian]
Baker C. Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Issues in Applied Linguistics. – №6(1). – Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2006.– 273 r.
Abykanova et al. Interactive Teaching methods as Pedagogical Innovation // Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun. – 2021. – T. 14. – №05. – P. 171–175.
Salehova L. Model bilingvalnogo obuchenia matematike [A model of bilingual mathematics education] // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. – 2008. – №3. – S. 161–165. [in Russian]
Kenner C. Bilingual families as literacy eco-systems // Early Years. – 2005. – Vol. 25. – №3. – P. 283–298.
Lin A., Man E. Bilingual Education: Southeast Asian perspectives. – Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2009. – 50 r.
Abramova N.V., Essina I.Iu. Innovacionnye strategii v bilingvalnom obuchenii [Innovative strategies in bilingual education] // Fundamentalnye issledovania. – 2014. – №6-2. – S. 345–349.
Bialystok C. Literacy: the extension of languages through other means // In: Cooper R., Shohamy E., Walters J. (Eds). New Perspectives and Issues in Educational Language Policy. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001. – R. 428–442.
Kenjebaeva J.E., Kairlieva N.B. Koncept «Moloko» v kazahskom iazyke i kulture: lingvokulturologicheskiy aspekt opisania [The concept of "Milk" in the Kazakh language and culture: the linguistic and cultural aspect of the description] // Nauka i jizn Kazahstana. – 2020. – №10/1 (141). – S. 193–198.
