MUHAMMED SALİH’İN ŞİİRİNDEKİ MUHALİF GÖRÜŞLERİN İNCELENMESİ
Anahtar Kelimeler:
Muhammed Salih, anti-Sovyetçilik, post anti-Sovyetçilik, Ceditçilik, Özbek şiiri.Özet
This article examines the appearance of protest elements in the poetry of Muhammed Salih, an Uzbek poet, a representative of the «Metaphorist school» in Soviet Uzbek literature and the founder of protest and emigration poetry. In order to clarify this issue from all angles, the poet's protest poems were classified into two macrogroups: Soviet Union period (anti-Sovietism) and post-Soviet period protest (post-anti-Sovietism). The protest motif in the poet Salih's poetry can be noted as a new facet of the research work in the context of this article for the first time in the literature of Kazakhstan.
In the first part of the article, the problem of nationalism (Turkism) and anti-Sovietism, which have become the main theme in M. Salih's work in the last forty years, was comprehensively analyzed. By using several literary methods, the characteristics of anti-Soviet protest, longing for independence and the achievement of sovereignty in the poet's poems were determined. The object and subject of the leitmotif «awakening» were studied in such poems as «Mother's Word», «Mouse in the Cage», «Awakening» written in this period. Focusing on the physics and metaphysics of the poems, the influence of the literature of the modernists before him was discussed. Special attention was paid to the beauty of allegory and metaphor in his poems and the peculiarity of writing, the meaning hidden in the surface of his poetry. The use of symbols and motifs characteristic of the classicist literature in the poet's poems was studied.
In the second part of the article, the feature of protest poetry in the post-Soviet Republic of Uzbekistan was studied. On the basis of M. Salih's poetry, the expression of critical ideas and values such as independence, civil society, freedom of speech, and human rights were analyzed. The process of development of emigration literature in modern Uzbek literature was differentiated based on the poet's poems such as «Strange tree», «Love of the enemy of the people for the homeland», «Prayer of the exiled exile». The characteristics of Salih's poetic nature were comprehensively demonstrated. The influence of the poet's political and literary life in emigration was analyzed in a comparative and synergistic aspect.
In M. Salih's protest poetry, the themes of Turkish unity and independence of Turkestan, which are of special importance, are partially connected with his nationalist (Turkish) poems. In the framework of such studies, an analytical forecast was made for the development of protest literature in modern Uzbek literature, the topics and issues raised, poetic power, and influence in the formation of civil society.
The article focuses on the manifestations of protests during the Soviet Union and the post-Soviet period in M. Salih's works, and his poems are studied from several angles. His struggle for justice and his contribution to world knowledge were also taken into consideration.
Referanslar
KAYNAKÇA
Türk Dünyası Çağdaş Edebiyatları El Kitabı. – İstanbul: Kesit, 2018. – 824 s.
Бурсина М.В. Мотив протеста в литературе «Рассерженных молодых людей» // Вестник государственного гуманитарно-технологического университета. – 2018. – №2. – C. 58–62.
Салих М. Вал-Фажр / Ауд. Ф. Төлтай. – Астана: AR, 2022. – 278 б.
Парфи Р. Сакина. – Ташкент: Мухаррир, 2013. – 376 c.
Hayıt B. Türkistanda Öldürülen Türk Şairleri. – Ankara: Kardeş, 1971. – 52 s.
Salih M. İmperatif. – İstanbul: Yitik Şifa, 2021. – 416 s.
Батлер А. Мирология. Прогресс сила в мировых отношениях. Т.II. SCHOLARICA, 2019. – 818 с.
Шафранская Э. О русском ориентализме, «русском мире» в колониальной литературе и их переосмыслении в литературе постколониальной. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/161_nlo_1_2020/article/21984/. (дата обращения: 23.07.2022)
Halikova N. Millî Uyanış Dönemi Özbek Şiirinde Millet Ruhunun Betimlenmesi / Túrkologıa. – 2021. – №2 (106). – Б. 96–109. https://doi.org/10.47526/turkology.v106i2.628
Жиенбаев Е.Б., Семиз К. М. Жұмабаевтың өлеңдеріндегі ұлттық романтизмнің түркиялық ақындардың шығармашылығымен салыстырылуы / Керуен. – 2022. – №1. – Б. 190–206. https://doi.org/10.53871/2078-8134.2022.1-15
Фуко М. Интеллектуалы и власть. Часть 3. – Москва: Праксис, 2006. – 320 с.
Хикс С. Объясняя постмодернизм. – Москва: Рипол, 2021. – 320 с.
Сироткина А.И., Альпидовская М.Л. Неоколониализм XXI века: глобализм и мир-системность // Теоретическая экономика. – 2020. – №12. – C. 97–109.
REFERENCES
Turk dunyasy chagdash edebiyatları el kitabı [Handbook of Contemporary Literatures of the Turkic World]. – Istanbul: Kesit, 2018. – 824 s. [in Turkish]
Bursina M.V. Motiv protesta v literature “Rasserjennyh molodyh liudei” [The motive of protest in the literature of “Angry young people”] // Vestnik gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-tehnologicheskogo universiteta. – 2018. – №2. – S. 58–62. [in Russian]
Salih M. Val-Fazhr [Val-Fazhr] / Aud. F. Toltai. – Astana: AR, 2022. – 278 b. [in Kazakh]
Parfi R. Sakina. – Tashkent: Muharrir, 2013. – 376 s. [in Uzbek]
Haiyt B. Tukistanda oldurulen turk shairleri. – Ankara: Kardesh, 1971. – 52 s. [in Turkish]
Salih M. Imperatif [The Imperative]. – Istanbul: Yitik Shifa, 2021. – 416 s. [in Turkish]
Batler A. Mirologija. Progress sila v mirovyh otnoshenijah [Metrology. Progress is a force in world relations]. T.II. Scholarica, 2019. – 818 s. [in Russian]
Shafranskaia E. O russkom orientalizme, «russkom mire» v kolonialnoi literature i ih pereosmyslenii v literature postkolonialnoi [About Russian Orientalism, the “Russian world” in colonial literature and their reinterpretation in postcolonial literature]. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/161_nlo_1_2020/article/21984/. [in Russian]. (data obrashenia 23.07.2022)
Halikova N. Milli uyanysh donemi Uzbek shiirinde millet ruhunun betimlenmesi [Depicting the National Spirit in Uzbek Poetry of the National Awakening Period] // Turkologiia. – 2021. – №2 (106). – B. 96–109. https://doi.org/10.47526/turkology.v106i2.628 [in Turkish]
Jienbaev E.B., Semiz K. М. Jumabaevtyn olenderindegi ulttyq romantizmnin turkiyalyq aqyndardyn shygarmashylygymen salystyryluy // Keruen. – 2022. – №1. – B. 190–206. https://doi.org/10.53871/2078-8134.2022.1-15 [in Kazakh].
Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast [Intellectuals and power]. Chast 3. – M.: Praksis, 2006. – 320 s. [in Russian]
Hiks S. Obiasniaia postmodernizm [Explaining Postmodernism]. – M.: Ripol, 2021. – 320 s. [in Russian]
Sirotkina A.I., Alpidovskaia M.L. Neokolonializm XXI veka: globalizm i mir-sistemnost [Neocolonialism of the XXI century: Globalism and the world-system] // Teoreticheskaia ekonomika. – 2020. – №12. – S. 97–109. [in Russian]
