Unisex Names in the Kazakh Language

17 16

Authors

  • Zh.A. Agabekova Nazarbayev University
  • А.А. Almasbek A. Baitursynuly Kostanay Regional University

Keywords:

Onomastics, Anthroponyms, Unisex Names, Kazakh language, Male name, Female name.

Abstract

In human life, the prevention of violence, the revival of principles of humane existence, and the creation of a just world for future generations require eliminating inequality between women and men. In this context, comprehensive scientific exploration of the topic becomes increasingly relevant. In contemporary research, the issue of new terms in languages always takes center stage, which is an undeniable fact. This article introduces, for the first time in the scientific community, the term “unisex names”.
In the Kazakh language, there is no specific category dedicated solely to gender, and therefore, this topic is not addressed by language norms. Nevertheless, there are elements that consistently manifest in the form of personal names. In Kazakh society, when choosing a name for a child, their gender is taken into account, but there are names that can be given to both boys and girls. This article explores the reasons for studying unisex names in the Kazakh language, their impact on a child's psychology, and their role in the social adaptation of an individual in society. Research on unisex names in the Kazakh language has been systematized, and a comparison with similar forms in other cultures has been conducted. Special attention is given to the structure and creation of lexical-semantic meanings of unisex names in the Kazakh language, and factors influencing the sociocultural adaptation of the personality have been identified. To validate the findings, a survey was conducted using a specifically designed questionnaire.

References

ПАЙДАЛАНЫЛҒАН ӘДЕБИЕТТЕР ТІЗІМІ

Suleimenova G.S. Effectiveness of Teaching Kazakh Onomastics and Toponyms to University Students // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2023. – №4(130). – Б. 318–328. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-4/2664-0686.26

Lag om personnamn. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-20161013-om-personnamn_sfs-2016-1013/ (date of access 15.08.2024)

Alvarez L. Jens and Vita, but Molli? Danes Favor Common Names. – 2004. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/08/world/europe/jens-and-vita-but-molli-danes-favor-common-names.html (date of access 15.08.2024)

Tagliabue J. A Swede by Any Other Name. In Fact, Many Swedes. – 2011. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/01/world/europe/01stockholm.html (date of access 15.08.2024)

Marszal A. Why you can't be called Duncan in Iceland. – 2014. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/iceland/10930163/Why-you-cant-be-called-Duncan-in-Iceland.html (date of access 15.08.2024)

Bertrand M., Mullainathan S. Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination // The American Economic Review. – 2004, September. 7. Әлиакбарова А.Т. Жаңа әлеуметтік-мәдени жағдайдағы заманауи қазақ антропонимиясы: трансмиссия, трансформация: филол. ғыл. док. … дис. – Алматы, 2020. – 278 б.

Barry H., Harper A. Feminization of unisex names from 1960 to 1990 // Names. – 1993. – Т. 41, №4. https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.1993.41.4.228

Barry H., Harper A. Unisex names for babies born in Pennsylvania 1990–2010 // Names: A Journal of Onomastics. – 2014. – Т. 62, №1. https://doi.org/10.1179/0027773813Z.00000000060

Жанұзақов Т.Ж. Қазақ есімдерінің тарихы (Лингвистикалық және тарихи-этнографиялық талдау). – Алматы: Ғылым, 1971. – 218 б.

Мусабекова У.А. Мотивациялық аспект антропонимдердің қазақ және орыс тілдеріндегі көрінісі: филол. ғыл. канд. ... автореф. – Алматы: Абай атындағы Алматы мемлекеттік университеті, 1996. – 24 б.

Мадиева Г.Б. Имя собственное в контексте познания. – 2-басылым, өңделген және толықтырылған. – Алматы: Қазақ университеті, 2010. – 239 б.

Тұранов Ы.Ә. Қазақ антропонимдерін дәуірлеу мәселелері // ҚазҰУ хабаршысы. Филология сериясы. – 2012. – №5–6 (139–140).– Б. 211–216.

REFERENCES 1. Suleimenova G.S. Effectiveness of Teaching Kazakh Onomastics and Toponyms to University Students // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2023. – №4(130). – B. 318–328. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-4/2664-0686.26 2. Lag om personnamn. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-20161013-om-personnamn_sfs-2016-1013/ (date of access 15.08.2024) 3. Alvarez L. Jens and Vita, but Molli? Danes Favor Common Names. – 2004. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/08/world/europe/jens-and-vita-but-molli-danes-favor-common-names.html (date of access 15.08.2024) 4. Tagliabue J. A Swede by Any Other Name. In Fact, Many Swedes. – 2011. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/01/world/europe/01stockholm.html (date of access 15.08.2024) 5. Marszal A. Why you can't be called Duncan in Iceland. – 2014. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/iceland/10930163/Why-you-cant-be-called-Duncan-in-Iceland.html (date of access 15.08.2024) 6. Bertrand M., Mullainathan S. Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination // The American Economic Review. – 2004, September. 7. Aliakbarova A.T. Zhana aleumettіk-madeni zhagdaidagy zamanaui qazaq antroponimiasy: transmissia, transformacia: filol. gyl. dok. … dis. [Modern Kazakh anthroponymy in a new socio-cultural context: transmission, transformation: dis.]. – Almaty, 2020. – 278 b. [in Kazakh] 8. Barry H., Harper A. Feminization of unisex names from 1960 to 1990 // Names. – 1993. – T. 41, №4. https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.1993.41.4.228 9. Barry H., Harper A. Unisex names for babies born in Pennsylvania 1990–2010 // Names: A Journal of Onomastics. – 2014. – T. 62, №1. https://doi.org/10.1179/0027773813Z.00000000060 10. Zhanuzaqov T.Zh. Qazaq esіmderіnіn tarihy (Lingvistikalyq zhane tarihi-etnografialyq taldau) [History of Kazakh names (linguistic and historical and ethnographic analysis)]. – Almaty: Gylym, 1971. – 218 b. [in Kazakh] 11. Musabekova U.A. Motivacialyq aspekt antroponimderdіn qazaq zhane orys tіlderіndegі korіnіsі: filol. gyl. kand. ... avtoref. [Motivational aspect expression of anthroponyms in Kazakh and Russian: abstract]. – Almaty: Abai atyndagy Almaty memlekettіk universitetі, 1996. – 24 b. [in Kazakh] 12. Madieva G.B. Imia sobstvennoe v kontekste poznania [Proper name in the context of cognition]. – Almaty: Qazaq universiteti, 2010. – 239 b. [in Kazakh] 13. Turanov U.A. Qazaq antroponimderіn dauіrleu maselelerі [Problems of the epoch-making of Kazakh anthroponyms] // QazUU habarshysy. Filologia seriasy. – 2012. – №5–6 (139–140). – B. 211–216. [in Kazakh]

Published

2025-06-30