Prerequisites and Methodology of Discursive Study of Religion
Anahtar Kelimeler:
discourse, discursive research, definitions of religion, scientific knowledge, terminology, discursive change, episteme, ethnocentrism, academic environment.Özet
In the article basic prerequisites of discursive study of religion are shown,
methodology is analyzed. On the basis of discursive methodology, the specifics of defining religion
are shown, the process of the formation of these definitions in the academic environment and the
factors influencing it are analyzed. Concepts such as discourse, discursive structures, discursive
events, discursive relations, discursive actions, and sphere are defined. Examples are considered and
explained to reveal the meaning of each concept. The reasons for the search for new paradigms in
the self-determination of the European academic environment are described and explained. The
methodology of discourse research in this direction is considered. The complex of meanings of the
concept of Western esotericism are analyzed. The processes that occurred as a result of discursive
changes are described. The importance and impact of scientific knowledge are studied. Conclusions
are made for the disclosure of the topic using comparative analysis, induction and deduction,
analysis, synthesis, synchronic and diachronic methods. The importance and benefits of discourse
research are explained. The article identifies and analyzes the necessary concepts used in the
discursive study of religion as an area of research that socially systematizes scientific knowledge
about the concept of religion and turns it into a historical category. Discourse about religion
generalizes and legitimizes social reality and structures with meaning. Although discursive and
historical analysis of religion is not a separate method, it can become a direction of research. The
essence and significance of the research conducted on the basis of this direction are reflected in the
article based on specific examples.
Referanslar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Loic Wacquant. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. – 332 р.
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Logic of Practice, translated by Richard Nice. – Cambridge & Oxford: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell, 1990. – 340 р.
Әбубәкірова А.Е. Қазіргі Батыс Еуропа елдеріндегі саяси-әлеуметтік үрдістерге исламның ықпалы жайлы дискурс // «Дінтанудың қазіргі жағдайы мен оның даму перспективалары» атты халықаралық ғылыми-тәжірибелік конференция материалдары жинағы, ҚазҰУ (2019). – Б. 46–50.
Von Stuckrad, Kocku. Reflections on the Limits of Reflection: An Invitation to the Discursive Study of Religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 22 (2010). – P. 156–169.
Дворкин А.Л. Сектоведение. Тоталитарные секты. Опыт систематического исследования. – Нижний Новгород: Христианская библиотека, 2014. – 816 с.
Hanegraaff, Wouter J. “Altered States of Knowledge: The Attainment of Gnōsis in the Hermetica.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (2008). – Р. 128–163.
Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. – Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986. – 296 р.
Rorty, Richard. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. – 201 р.
Rennie, Bryan. “After This Strange Starting: Method, Theory and the Philosophy of Religion(s).” Method and Theory in the Study of Religions 22. – Р. 116–135.
Weber, Max. “Science as a Vocation.” In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (trans., ed. and introduction), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. – London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964. – Р. 129–156.
Sarasin, Philipp. Geschichtswissenschaft und Diskursanalyse. – Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2003. – 257 s.
Landwehr, Achim. Historische Diskursanalyse. 2nd ed. – Frankfurt/M. and New York:Campus, 2009. – 188 s.
Nikander, Pirjo. Constructionism and Discourse Analysis. In James A. Holstein and Jaber F. Gubrium (eds.), Handbook of Constructionist Research. – New York: The Guilford Press, 2008. – 413-428 рр.
Lincoln, Bruce. Theses on Method. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 17(2005): 8–10 рр. (First published in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 8 (1996): 225–227 рр.)
Дильбарханова Д.А. Екпе жасауға қатысты діни көзқарастар мен ұстанымдардың салыстырмалы талдауы // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2020. – №3 (117). – Б. 330–338. [Электронды ресурс]. URL: https://doi.org/10.47526/2020/2664-0686.030
