Formation and Development of Mathematical Literacy in the Context of PISA-2021 Program Concept
Anahtar Kelimeler:
: modular learning technology, mathematical literacy, algorithmic teaching method, thinking skills, task reduction method, PISA international studies.Özet
. This article presents the results of pedagogical experiments, which revealed
educational problems that teachers face in the process of teaching mathematical literacy to
schoolchildren: a low proportion of practice-oriented tasks in the total number of educational tasks
in school mathematics intended for 15-year-old schoolchildren, a passive attitude of teachers to the
formation of mathematical literacy among schoolchildren. The analysis of the experimental data
made it possible to conclude that the knowledge and skills of teachers on the issues of reducing the
standard task of the school mathematics course are insufficient to problem situations in the context
of the PISA assessment tasks, compiling task systems for these tasks, containing an algorithm for
solving the assigned problem, description of a visual object that allows the visualization of the task.
To solve these problems, the paper proposes to apply a modular learning technology in the process
of teaching schoolchildren mathematical literacy, an algorithmic method for reducing a standard
task to assessment-learning tasks in the context of the PISA-2021 program concept. In the work,
examining the task to the problem situation as an object of mental activity of students, the main
components of the "Mathematical Reasoning" of the student are highlighted. Namely: recognizes
the area of the task; singles out the main components of the tasks; to bring data under known
concepts; establishes interdisciplinary links; applies induction, interdisciplinary knowledge in the
preparation of a mathematical model; solves a mathematical problem; interprets, evaluates the
solution in the context of the phenomenon under consideration. The analysis of algorithms for
solving tasks made it possible to identify the following key structural components of mathematical
literacy: understanding the context of tasks; the ability to establish correspondences between
various objects, apply induction and knowledge, build mathematical models, find solutions to
mathematical models of tasks, interpret and evaluate the solutions obtained; have mathematical
reasoning skills. The final experimental study confirmed the effectiveness of the developed
methodology for the formation and development of mathematical literacy at 15 year old
schoolchildren.
Referanslar
OECD. The Future of Education and skills, Education 2030. [Электронный ресурс]. URL:
https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20 (05.04.2018).pdf (дата
обращения 12.01.2023)
Niemann D., Martens K. Soft governance by hard fact? The OECD as a knowledge broker in education
policy // Global Social Policy. – 2018. – №18(3). – P. 267–283. DOI: 10.1177/1468018118794076
PISA 2021. PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework (Draft). [Электронный ресурс]. URL: chromeextension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.oecd.org/pisa/sitedocument/PISA-2021-
mathematics-framework.pdf (дата обращения 12.01.2023)
Wang H.H., Charoenmuang M., Knobloch N.A. et al. Defining interdisciplinary collaboration based on
high school teachers’ beliefs and practices of STEM integration using a complex designed system //
International Journal of Stem Education. – 2020. – №7(3). – С. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-
-0201-4
Lee J., Park D. Do American and Korean education systems converge? Tracking school reform policies
and outcomes in Korea and the USA // Asia Pacific Education Review. – 2014. – №15(3). – P. 391–399.
DOI: 10.1007/s12564-014-9325-x
Abu Bakar M.A., Ismail N. Exploring students Metacognitive Regulation skills and Mathematics
Achievement in Implementation of 21st Century Learning in Malaysia // Problems of Education in the
st Century. – 2020. – №78 (3). – P. 314–327. DOI: 10.33225/pec/20.78.314
Saarela M., Karkkainen T. Knowledge Discovery from the Programme for International Student
Assessment // Learning Analytics: Fundamentals, Applications, and Trends: A view of the Current State
of the Art to Enhance E-Learning. – 2017. – №94. – P. 229–267. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_8
Bi H.H. Benchmarking the international compulsory education performance of 65 countries and
economies: Findings from PISA 2006, 2009, and 2012 // Benchmarking-an International Journal. –
– №25(1). – P. 98–119. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-09-2016-0144
Retnawati H., Wulandari N.F. The Development of students’ mathematical literacy Proficiency //
Problems of Education in the 21st Century. – 2019. – №77(4). – P. 502–514. DOI:
33225/pec/19.77.502 10. Jailani J., Retnawati H., Djidu H., et al. Mathematical literacy Proficiency Development Based on
Content, Context, and Process // Problems of Education in the 21st Century. – 2020. – №78(1). – P. 80–
DOI: 10.33225/pec/20.78.80
Addey C. Golden relics & historical standards: how the OECD is expanding global education
governance through PISA for Development // Critical Research in Education. – 2017. –№58 (3). – P.
–325. DOI:10.1080/17508487.2017.1352006
Мубараков А.М., Атаев Б.К., Мусайбеков Р.К. Геометриялық есептерді шешуде оң сыңар ми
қызметінің ерекшеліктерін қолдану // Қарағанды университетінің хабаршысы. Педагогика
сериясы. – 2018. – №4. – Б. 31–38.
Алибекова Ж.Д., Мейрбекова Г.П., Кошанова Г.Д. Математикалық модельдеу әдісін қолдану
арқылы оқушылардың математикалық ойлау қабілетін қалыптастыру // Ясауи университетінің
хабаршысы. – 2022. – №4(126). – Б. 212–224.
Виленкин Н.Я., Блох А.Я., Таварткиладзе Р.К. Воспитание мыслительных способностей
учащихся в процессе обучения математике. В кн.: Современные проблемы методики
преподавания математики. – М.: Просвещение, 1985. – С. 201–221.
OECD. The Future of Education and skills, Education 2030. [Электронный ресурс]. URL:
https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20 (05.04.2018).pdf (дата
обращения 12.01.2023)
Niemann D., Martens K. Soft governance by hard fact? The OECD as a knowledge broker in education
policy // Global Social Policy. – 2018. – №18(3). – P. 267–283. DOI: 10.1177/1468018118794076
PISA 2021. PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework (Draft). [Электронный ресурс]. URL: chromeextension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.oecd.org/pisa/sitedocument/PISA-2021-
mathematics-framework.pdf (дата обращения 12.01.2023)
Wang H.H., Charoenmuang M., Knobloch N.A. et al. Defining interdisciplinary collaboration based on
high school teachers’ beliefs and practices of STEM integration using a complex designed system //
International Journal of Stem Education. – 2020. – №7(3). – С. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-
-0201-4
Lee J., Park D. Do American and Korean education systems converge? Tracking school reform policies
and outcomes in Korea and the USA // Asia Pacific Education Review. – 2014. – №15(3). – P. 391–399.
DOI: 10.1007/s12564-014-9325-x
Abu Bakar M.A., Ismail N. Exploring students Metacognitive Regulation skills and Mathematics
Achievement in Implementation of 21st Century Learning in Malaysia // Problems of Education in the
st Century. – 2020. – №78 (3). – P. 314–327. DOI: 10.33225/pec/20.78.314
Saarela M., Karkkainen T. Knowledge Discovery from the Programme for International Student
Assessment // Learning Analytics: Fundamentals, Applications, and Trends: A view of the Current State
of the Art to Enhance E-Learning. – 2017. – №94. – P. 229–267. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_8
Bi H.H. Benchmarking the international compulsory education performance of 65 countries and
economies: Findings from PISA 2006, 2009, and 2012 // Benchmarking-an International Journal. –
– №25(1). – P. 98–119. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-09-2016-0144
Retnawati H., Wulandari N.F. The Development of students’ mathematical literacy Proficiency //
Problems of Education in the 21st Century. – 2019. – №77(4). – P. 502–514. DOI:
33225/pec/19.77.502
Jailani J., Retnawati H., Djidu H., et al. Mathematical literacy Proficiency Development Based on
Content, Context, and Process // Problems of Education in the 21st Century. – 2020. – №78(1). – P. 80–
DOI: 10.33225/pec/20.78.80
Addey C. Golden relics & historical standards: how the OECD is expanding global education
governance through PISA for Development // Critical Research in Education. – 2017. –№58 (3). – P.
–325. DOI:10.1080/17508487.2017.1352006
Mubarakov A.M., Ataev B.K., Musaibekov R.K. Geometrialyq esepterdi sheshude on synar mi
qyzmetinin erekshelikterin qoldanu [Using the features of the work of the right hemisphere in solving geometric problems] Qaragandy universitetinin habarshysy. Pedagogika seriasy. – 2018. – №4. – P. 31–
[in Kazakh]
Alibekova J.D., Meyrbekova G.P., Koshanova G.D. Matematikalyq modeldeu adisin qoldanu arqyly
oqushylardyn matematikalyq oilau qabiletin qalyptastyru [Formation of students' ability to think
mathematically using the method of mathematical modeling] // Iasaui universitetinin habarshysy. –
– №4(126). – B. 212–224. [in Kazakh]
Vilenkin N.Ia., Bloh A.Ia., Tavartkiladze R.K. Vospitanie myslitelnyh sposobnostei uchashihsia v
processe obuchenia matematike. V kn.: Sovremennye problemy metodiki prepodavania matematiki
[Education of mental abilities of students in the process of teaching mathematics. In: Modern problems
of methods of teaching mathematics]. – M.: Prosveshenie, 1985. – P. 201–221. [in Russian]
