Teaching Literary Studies through the Technology of Critical Thinking

Authors

  • B.B. Kelgembayeva S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University
  • A.M. Kartaeva S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University
  • Zh.Zh. Azretbergenova IT School-Lyceum named after Zh. Tashenov

Keywords:

critical thinking technology, literary theory, aesthetics, mental activity, competence, individual and group tasks.

Abstract

The article considers the ways of effective use of critical thinking technology in teaching literary disciplines. The authors, referring to the works of the founders of the theory of critical thinking technology, emphasize the special role of this technology in the formation of the cognitive potential of a modern person. Using this technology, the teacher carefully tracks and studies changes in the consciousness of students, based on this, chooses teaching methods in accordance with the requests of students. According to the authors, this technology forms the student as a thoughtful and active participant in educational activities, capable of continuous self-education. Within the framework of the discipline «Theory of Literature and Aesthetics» of the 4th-year curriculum «Kazakh language and Literature», the ways of developing critical thinking among students are shown by the example of duet lectures, interactive practical classes and IWS. Attention is paid to the effective use of knowledge and competencies of graduate students in the history of Kazakhstan, philosophy and cultural studies. Through Group and independent tasks, the methods of analysis of the student's educational activity, the ability to draw conclusions, and lead to the creation of research are outlined. In the summary, the teacher proves that the task of the teacher is to lead the student to a scientific study of a literary problem, bringing to the fore the personal opinion and impressions of his student, his satisfied vision, and to form a scientifically based view of the student on this problem.

References

Перескокова Т.А., Соловьев В.П. Учебный процесс на основе принципа студентоцентрированности // Вестник высшей школы. – 2017. – №2. – С. 60–63. doi.org/10.20339/AM.02-17.060

Чатфилд Т. Критическое мышление. Анализируй, сомневайся, формируй свое мнение. – 2002. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.ozon.ru/product/kriticheskoe-myshlenie-analiziruy-somnevaysya-formiruy-svoe-mnenie-chatfild-tom-252642936 (Дата обращения 5.05.2022).

Маратқызы С., Шілдебаев Ж.Б. Болашақ педагогтардың оқу-зерттеу нәтижелерін коммерцияландырудың құрылымдық мазмұны // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2022. – №1 (123). – Б.181–195. doi.org/10.47526/2022-1/2664-0686.16.

Халперн Д. Психология критического мышления. – Спб.: Питер, 2000 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: URL: https://royallib.com/book/halpern_dayana/psihologiya_kriticheskogo_mishleniya (Дата обращения 5.05.2022).

Клустер Д. Что такое критическое мышление? // Критическое мышление и новые виды грамотности. – М.: ЦГЛ, 2005. С. 5-13. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kriticheskoe-myshlenie-i-ego-formirovanie-v-vysshem-uchebnom-zavedenii/viewer (Дата обращения 5.05.2022).

Зимняя И.А. Общая культура и социально-профессиональная компетентность человека // Высшее образование сегодня. – 2005. – №11. – С. 14–20.

Пиаже Ж. Избранные психологические труды. – М.: Международная педагогическая академия, 1994. – 680 с.

Кенжебаева А.Т., Сансызбаева Д.Б., Касымова Г.К. Психолого-педагогические условия формирования межкультурной компетенции у студентов // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2022. – №1 (123). – Б. 92–101. doi.org/10.47526/2022-1/2664-0686.08

Аттард А., Ди Иорио Э., Гевен К., Санта Р. Студентоцентрированное обучение. Инструментарий для студентов, профессорско-преподавательского состава и вузов. – Астана: НКАОКО-IQAA, 2017. – 64 с. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https: www.esu-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/2. (Дата обращения 5.05.2022)

Бітібаева Қ.О. Әдебиет пәнін оқытудың тиімді жолдары. – Алматы: Рауан, 1990. – 194 б.

REFERENCES

Pereskokova T.A., Soloviov V.P. Uchebnyi process na osnove principa studentocentrirovannosti [Educational process based on the principle of student-centered] // Vestnik vysshei shkoly. – 2017. – №2. – S. 60–63. doi.org/10.20339/AM.02-17.060 [in Russian]

Chatfild T. Kriticheskoe myshlenie. Analizirui, somnevaisia, formirui svoe mnenie [Analyze, doubt, form your opinion]. – 2002. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.ozon.ru/product/kriticheskoe-myshlenie-analiziruy-somnevaysya-formiruy-svoe-mnenie-chatfild-tom-252642936 (Data obrasheniia 5.05.2022). [in Russian]

Maratqyzy S., Shіldebaev J.B. Bolashaq pedagogtardyn oqu-zertteu natijelerіn kommerciialandyrudyn qurylymdyq mazmuny [Structural content of commercialization of educational and research results of future teachers] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2022. – №1 (123). – B. 181–195. doi.org/10.47526/2022-1/2664-0686.16.

Halpern D. Psihologiia kriticheskogo myshleniia [Psychology of critical thinking]. – Spb.: Piter, 2000 [Electronic resource]. URL: URL: https://royallib.com/book/halpern_dayana/psihologiya_kriticheskogo_mishleniya (Data obrasheniia 5.05.2022). [in Russian]

Kluster D. Chto takoe kriticheskoe myshlenie? [What is critical thinking?] // Kriticheskoe myshlenie i novye vidy gramotnosti. – M.: CGL, 2005. S. 5-13. [Electronic resource]. URL: URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kriticheskoe-myshlenie-i-ego-formirovanie-v-vysshem-uchebnom-zavedenii/viewer (Data obrasheniia 5.05.2022). [in Russian]

Zimniaia I.A. Obshaia kultura i socialno-professionalnaia kompetentnost cheloveka [General culture and socio-professional competence of a person] // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnia. – 2005. – №11. – S. 14–20. [in Russian]

Piazhe J. Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy [Selected psychological works]. – M.: Mejdunarodnaia pedagogicheskaia akademiia, 1994. – 680 s. [in Russian]

Kenjebaeva A.T., Sansyzbaeva D.B., Kasymova G.K. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie usloviia formirovaniia mejkulturnoi kompetencii u studentov [Psychological and pedagogical conditions for the formation of intercultural competence among students] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2022. – №1 (123). – B. 92–101. doi.org/10.47526/2022-1/2664-0686.08 [in Russian]

Attard A., Di Iorio E., Geven K., Santa R. Studentocentrirovannoe obuchenie. Instrumentariy dlia studentov, professorsko-prepodavatelskogo sostava i vuzov [Student-centered learning. Tools for students, faculty and universities.]. – Astana: HKAOKO-IQAA, 2017. – 64 s. [Electronic resource]. URL: https: www.esu-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/2. (Data obrasheniia 5.05.2022) [in Russian]

Bіtіbaeva Q.O. Adebiet panіn oqytudyn tiіmdі joldary [Effective ways to teach literature]. – Almaty: Rauan, 1990. – 194 b. [in Kazakh]

Published

2023-03-30