The use of alternative methods in working with underachieving students
30 27
Keywords:
physics, teaching, Alternative, Research, Trend, traditional system.Abstract
In a modern school, one of the main tasks is to ensure a high level of student performance and requires constant efforts. This problem concerns such disciplines of the Natural Science direction as physics. Physics lessons include not only complex theory, but also conducting experiments, solving problems.
In physics lessons, a high concentration of students is required for more effective assimilation of the material. Unfortunately, in a traditional school, conditions are not always created for this. Taking into account the fact that it is difficult for all students, especially those who are lagging behind, to take up extracurricular activities, we need to implement them. The traditional system may not contribute to not meeting the needs of these students and not increasing their motivation to learn.
This paper presents an alternative teaching method in extracurricular activities in the teaching of physics, which successfully integrates into the traditional teaching system and significantly increases the motivation and performance of lagging students. For students who do not have problems with academic performance, the proposed technique further stimulates interest in the subject of physics.
The reason for using alternative teaching techniques is related to improving the motivation of students with poor performance to understand and study physics. Since the greatest attention is paid to lagging students in this work, alternative methods make it possible to create favorable conditions for learning and mastering materials in physics. In this technology, non-standard approaches are widely used that allow you to fully reveal the potential of lagging students due to the fact that traditional methods turned out to be ineffective.
The relevance of this study is due to the problem of developing methods and techniques for working with lagging students in high school. Currently, the main methods are associated with developing learning, but alternative technologies are becoming more and more important. The advantage of using alternative technologies in extracurricular activities is their ability to surpass traditional methods, and successfully increase the performance of lagging students. Taking into account modern trends and digitalization, alternative technologies promise prospects and provide a wide field for choosing methods in order to improve performance in classrooms.
The purpose of this study is to provide modern alternative teaching methods to work with lagging students in school physics lessons, which are easily integrated into the traditional school system.
To achieve the goal, the following tasks were set:
Analysis of the compatibility of alternative learning technologies with traditional ones. Development of alternative teaching methods for lagging students that successfully integrate into the traditional school system and can be used within the framework of one lesson.
Conduct a pedagogical experiment using the methods developed with lagging students, analyze the results and draw conclusions about the compatibility of alternative methods with the traditional school system and their effectiveness for lagging students.
The object of the study is the integration of modern methods of alternative learning into the traditional system in order to improve the performance of lagging students. The subject of the study is the degree of integration of alternative teaching methods in a traditional school, based on the analysis of the progress of lagging students before and after the use of these methods.
The research methodology involves the development of alternative teaching methods that correspond to current trends and the analysis of the assimilation of the material in physics lessons after their implementation.
The novelty of the study is to propose alternative teaching methods that meet current trends in the education system and test them in a traditional school environment. This makes it possible to assess their compatibility with the traditional education system and their effectiveness for lagging students.
References
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/istoricheskie-predposylki-vozniknoveniya-alternativnogo obrazovaniya (дата обращения 14.11.22). 2. Воробьева М.В., Петухова Д.И. Современное альтернативное обучение детей в зарубежных школах // сборник материалов научно практической конференции «педагогическое мастерство и современные педагогические технологии». Барнаул, 2017. – б. 115-127. 3. Каптерев П.Ф. История русской педагогики. – спб.: издание О. Богдановой, 1909. – 540 б. 4. Касимова Р.Ш. Альтернативная образовательная система сарберри вэри скул. – казань: тггпу, 2011. – 52 б. 5.Https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/handle/net/32842/monografiya__gilyazova_.pdf?sequence=-1.(дата обращения: 15.11.2022).
Блинов А. Интерактивные методы в образовательном процессе. – м.: научная библиотека, 2015. – 262 б.
https://dlib.rsl.ru (дата обращения 14.11.22).
Припутнев А.С., Нестерова И.Н. Особенности альтернативногообразования (на примере практик свободных школ). // известия вгпу. – 2019 г. – № 2 (283). – б. 16-20.
Заболотная О.А. Альтернативное образование: постмодернистский контекст // вектор науки тгу. – 2010. – № 2(2). – б. 48.
Сыпченко Е.А. Инновационные педагогические технологии. Метод проектов в доу. – м.: детство-пресс, 2013. – 278 б.
Петрова Л.И. Как перестать ошибаться в воспитании детей: самые распространенные педагогические ошибки и методы борьбы с ними: моногр. – м.: феникс, 2018. – 357 б.
Волков Д.К. Метод обучения знаниям и технологическим умениям "сразу и на всю жизнь". – москва: огни, 2013. – 631 б.
Андриади И.П. Кейс-метод в педагогическом образовании. Теория и технология реализации. Тематический сборник кейсов. – м.: московский психолого-социальный университет (мпсу), 2014. – 353 б.
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/istoricheskie-predposylki-vozniknoveniya-alternativnogo-obrazovaniya (data obrashenııa 14.11.22).
Vorobeva M.V., Petýhova D.I. Sovremennoe alternatıvnoe obýchenıe deteı v zarýbejnyh shkolah // sbornık materıalov naýchno praktıcheskoı konferentsıı «pedagogıcheskoe masterstvo ı sovremennye pedagogıcheskıe tehnologıı». Barnaýl, 2017. – b. 115-127.
Kapterev P.F. Istorııa rýsskoı pedagogıkı. – spb.: ızdanıe О. Bogdanovoı, 1909. – 540 b.
Kasımova R.Sh. Alternatıvnaıa obrazovatelnaıa sıstema sarberrı verı skýl. – kazan: tggpý, 2011. – 52 b.
Https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/handle/net/32842/monografiya__gilyazova_.pdf?sequence=-1. (data obraenııa: 15.11.2022).
Blınov A. Interaktıvnye metody v obrazovatelnom protsesse. – m.: naýchnaıa bıblıoteka, 2015. – 262 b.
https://dlib.rsl.ru (data obrasheniya 14.11.22).
Prıpýtnev A.S., Nesterova I.N. Osobennostı alternatıvnogoobrazovanııa (na prımere praktıki svobodnyh shkol). // ızvestııa vgpý. – 2019 g. – № 2 (283). – b. 16-20.
Zabolotnaıa O.A. Alternatıvnoe obrazovanıe: postmodernıstskıı kontekst // vektor naýkı tgý. – 2010. – № 2(2). – b. 48.
Sypchenko E.A. Innovatsıonnye pedagogıcheskıe tehnologıı. Metod proektov v doý. – m.: detstvo-press, 2013. – 278 b.
Petrova L.I. Kak perestat oshıbatsıa v vospıtanıı deteı: samye rasprostranennye pedagogıcheskıe oshıbkı ı metody borby s nımı: monogr. – m.: fenıks, 2018. – 357 b.
Volkov D.K. Metod obýchenııa znanııam ı tehnologıcheskım ýmenııam "srazý ı na vsıý jızn". – moskva: ognı, 2013. – 631 b.
Andrıadı I.P. Keıs-metod v pedagogıcheskom obrazovanıı. Teorııa ı tehnologııa realızatsıı. Tematıcheskıı sbornık keısov. – m.: moskovskıı psıhologo-sotsıalnyı ýnıversıtet (mpsý), 2014. – 353 b.
