Çok Modlu Bir Nesne Olarak Rusça Ders Kitabı
19 41
Anahtar Kelimeler:
Russian language textbook, multimodality, multimodal literacy, multimodal text, visual design.Özet
The school textbook has always been the most important tool for organizing the educational process. Many studies by Kazakhstani scholars have been devoted to the issue of the quality of Kazakhstani textbooks. However, most of the research primarily focuses on the verbal component of textbooks, while their visual design is often underestimated. This suggests that the school textbook is not considered a holistic multimodal object, each element of which (both verbal and non-verbal) is intended to contribute to developing students' multimodal literacy. Since the development of educational literature today is carried out not only by scholars but also by practicing educators, there is a need to study teachers' professional attitudes toward the multimodality of textbooks. The article employs a survey method to investigate teachers' evaluative perception of the visual design of Russian language textbooks for the 5th grade from the publishers “Mektep” and “AEO NIS”. The authors found out that teachers transfer their negative attitude towards the verbal component of the textbook to its non-verbal aspect, poorly understanding the didactic potential of the multimodality of the textbook, which hinders their successful work in shaping and developing students' multimodal literacy. In light of the insufficiently high ranking of Kazakhstani students in international studies such as PIRLS and PISA, the results obtained in the article acquire special relevance. Based on the conducted analysis, the authors propose recommendations for solving the identified problem.
Referanslar
PISA 2022 results: Factsheets – Kazakhstan © OECD 2023 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-results-2022-volume-iii-factsheets_041a90f1-en/kazakhstan_16e58b46-en.html (date of access: 21.03.2024)
Reynolds K.A., Wry E., Mullis I.V.S., von Davier M. PIRLS 2021 Encyclopedia: Education Policy and Curriculum in Reading. – 2022. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://pirls2021.org/encyclopedia (date of access: 10.02.2024)
Кибрик А.А. Мультимодальная лингвистика // Когнитивные исследования: сборник научных трудов / под ред. Ю.И. Александрова, В.Д. Соловьева. – М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2010. – № 4. – С. 135–152.
Cazden C., Cope B., Fairclough N., Gee J. et al. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures // Harvard Educational Review. – 1996. – №66, 1. – P. 60–92.
Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures / Edited by Kalantzis M., Cope B. – London: Routledge, 2000. – 288 p. 6. Cope B., Kalantzis M. “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning // Framing languages and literacies. – Routledge, 2013. – С. 105–135.
Жаппаркулова К.Н., Туймебаев Ж.К., Джолдасбекова Б.У. Лингводидактический потенциал семиотически неоднородных текстов в обучении русскому языку школьников Казахстана // Русистика. – 2022. – Т. 20. – №4. – С. 500–514. http://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2022-20-4-500-514
Саметова Ф.Т. К вопросу о повышении качества школьного учебника // Проблемы и перспективы образования. – 2020. – №2. – С. 91–97. https://doi.org/10.51889/2020-2.2077-6861.12
Сагындыкова Г., Мынбаева А.К. История учебника и методическая система преподавания предмета: анализ связей и влияния // Наука и жизнь Казахстана. – 2019. – №11/2. – С. 186–190.
Кусаинов А.К. Теория создания и оценки учебника. – Алматы: АПН, 2021. – 152 с.
Қоңыратбай Т.Ә., Өмірбаева Г.Ш., Мұстапаева Т.К. Мектептегі «Музыка» оқулықтарын жетілдіру мүмкіндіктері // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2023. – №4(130). – Б. 187–197. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-4/2664-0686.16
Клокова Е.В., Белозёрова О.И., Ибраева Т.И. и др. Русский язык. Учебник для 5-го класса общеобразоват. шк. Часть 1, 2. – Астана: АОО «Назарбаев Интеллектуальные школы», 2018. – 128 с.
Сабитова З.К., Скляренко К.С. Русский язык. Учебник для 5-го класса общеобразоват. шк. в 2 частях. – Часть 1. – Алматы: Мектеп, 2018. – 177 с.
Государственный общеобязательный стандарт общего среднего образования. Приложение 4 к приказу Министра просвещения Республики Казахстан от 3 августа 2022 года №348 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2200029031#z530 (дата обращения: 8.02.2024)
Арутюнова Н.Д. Типы языковых значений. Оценка, событие, факт. – М.: Наука, 1988. – 340 с.
Матвеева А.А. Взаимодействие категории «свой – чужой» и категории оценки // Вестник Башкирского университета. – 2007. – Т. 12, №3. – С. 74–77.
Кусаинов А.К. К проблеме разработки современных учебников // Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Журналистика. Педагогика. – 2021. – №1. – С. 102–107.
Каирова М.К., Овчинникова А.В. Рабочая тетрадь как способ организации изучения творчества П. Васильева на факультативных занятиях по литературному краеведению // Язык и литература: теория и практика. – 2024. – №1. – С. 73–81. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7793-6083
Акошева М. Невербальные средства коммуникации – возможные причины неадекватной интерпретации речи // Язык и литература: теория и практика. – 2023. – №1. – 6–13.
REFERENCES
PISA 2022 results: Factsheets – Kazakhstan © OECD 2023 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-results-2022-volume-iii-factsheets_041a90f1-en/kazakhstan_16e58b46-en.html (date of access: 21.03.2024)
Reynolds K.A., Wry E., Mullis I.V.S., von Davier M. PIRLS 2021 Encyclopedia: Education Policy and Curriculum in Reading. – 2022. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://pirls2021.org/encyclopedia (date of access: 10.02.2024)
Kibrik A.A. Multimodalnaia lingvistika [Multimodal linguistics] // Kognitivnye issledovania: sbornik nauchnyh trudov / pod red. Iu.I. Aleksandrova, V.D. Solovieva. – M.: Institut psihologii RAN, 2010. – №4. – S. 135–152. [in Russian]
Cazden C., Cope B., Fairclough N., Gee J. et al. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures // Harvard Educational Review. – 1996. – №66, 1. – P. 60–92.
Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures / Edited by Kalantzis M., Cope B. – London: Routledge, 2000. – 288 p.
Cope B., Kalantzis M. “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning // Framing languages and literacies. – Routledge, 2013. – S. 105–135.
Japparkulova K.N., Tuimebaev J.K., Djoldasbekova B.U. Lingvodidakticheskiy potencial semioticheski neodnorodnyh tekstov v obuchenii russkomu iazyku shkolnikov Kazahstana [The linguistic potential of semiotic heterogeneous texts in teaching Russian to schoolchildren in Kazakhstan] // Rusistika. – 2022. – T. 20. – №4. – S. 500–514. http://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2022-20-4-500-514 [in Russian]
Sametova F.T. K voprosu o povyshenii kachestva shkolnogo uchebnika [On the issue of improving the quality of a school textbook] // Problemy i perspektivy obrazovania. – 2020. – №2. – S. 91–97. https://doi.org/10.51889/2020-2.2077-6861.12 [in Russian]
Sagyndykova G., Mynbaeva A.K. Istoria uchebnika i metodicheskaia sistema prepodavania predmeta: analiz sviazei i vliiania [History textbooks and the methodological system of teaching the subject: analysis of connections and influence] // Nauka i jizn Kazahstana. – 2019. – №11/2. – S. 186–190. [in Russian]
Kusainov A.K. Teoria sozdania i ocenki uchebnika [Theory of textbook creation and evaluation]. – Almaty: APN, 2021. – 152 s. [in Russian]
Qonyratbai T.A., Omіrbaeva G.Sh., Mustapaeva T.K. Mekteptegі «Muzyka» oqulyqtaryn jetіldіru mumkіndіkterі [The possibilities of improving the school textbook on “Music”] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2023. – №4(130). – B. 187–197. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-4/2664-0686.16[ in Kazakh]
Klokova E.V., Beloziorova O.I., Ibraeva T.I. i dr. Russkiy iazyk. Uchebnik dlia 5-go klassa obsheobrazovat. shk. [Russian language. Textbook for the 5th grade of a secondary school]. Chast 1, 2. – Astana: AOO «Nazarbaev Intellektualnye shkoly», 2018. – 128 s. [in Russian]
Sabitova Z.K., Skliarenko K.S. Russkiy iazyk. Uchebnik dlia 5-go klassa obsheobrazovat. shk. v 2 chastiah [Russian language. Textbook for the 5th grade of a secondary school in 2 parts]. – Chast 1. – Almaty: Mektep, 2018. – 177 s. [in Russian]
Gosudarstvennyi obsheobiazatelnyi standart obshego srednego obrazovania [State Mandatory Standard of General Secondary Education]. Prilojenie 4 k prikazu Ministra prosveshenia Respubliki Kazahstan ot 3 avgusta 2022 goda №348. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2200029031#z530 (date of access: 8.02.2024) [in Russian]
Arutiunova N.D. Tipy iazykovyh znacheniy. Ocenka, sobytie, fakt [Types of language values. Assessment, event, fact]. – M.: Nauka, 1988. – 340 s. [in Russian]
Matveeva A.A. Vzaimodeistvie kategorii «svoi – chujoi» i kategorii ocenki [Interaction of the “friend-foe” category and the evaluation category] // Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. – 2007. – T. 12, №3. – S. 74–77. [in Russian]
Kusainov A.K. K probleme razrabotki sovremennyh uchebnikov [On the problem of developing modern textbooks] // Jurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Jurnalistika. Pedagogika. – 2021. – №1. – S. 102–107. [in Russian]
Kairova M.K., Ovchinnikova A.V. Rabochaia tetrad kak sposob organizacii izuchenia tvorchestva P. Vasilieva na fakultativnyh zaniatiiah po literaturnomu kraevedeniu [Workbook as a way to organize the study of P. Vasiliev's work in optional classes on literary local lore] // Iazyk i literatura: teoria i praktika. – 2024. – №1. – S. 73–81. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7793-6083 [in Russian]
Akosheva M. Neverbalnye sredstva kommunikacii – vozmojnye prichiny neadekvatnoi interpretacii rechi [Language and literature: theory and practice] // Iazyk i literatura: teoria i praktika. – 2023. – №1. – 6–13. [in Russian]
