CRITERIA-BASED ASSESSMENT MODEL IN THE EDUCATION SYSTEM OF KAZAKHSTAN
338 306
Keywords:
criteria-based assessment, Formative-Summative assessment, student performance, achievements, evaluation program, measurement.Abstract
The article deals with the problems of using the Criteria-based Assessment Model in Kazakhstan's education system. The Criteria-based Assessment Model uses specific quantitative indicators of students' understanding of the curriculum, an objective and reliable assessment of students' knowledge and achievements. This assessment system enables teachers to identify and evaluate each student's strengths and weaknesses, assess their learning needs and achieve educational goals. Additionally, it allows for targeted learning, feedback, and compliance with international standards. The Criteria-based Assessment Model aims to enhance student motivation and engagement through formative and summative evaluations. The formative assessment provides ongoing feedback and support while the summative assessment evaluates the overall curriculum at each stage of academic study and at the end of the year. The research uses a quantitative approach to assessing criteria. The Criteria Assessment Model demonstrates the quality of English language proficiency of secondary school students in the second quarter through formative and summative evaluations. It helps teachers in Kazakhstan's education system to achieve students' academic success and the objective of controlling and evaluation.
References
Glazer R. Criteria-referenced measurement // Review of Educational Research. – 1963. – №33(4). – P. 445–459.
https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/3312909
Boyle J.R., & Charles M. Criteria-based assessment: A model for defining and measuring learning outcomes. 2010.
William D., Lee C., Harrison C., & Black P. Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement // Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. – 2004. – №11(1). – P. 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000208994
Scriven M. (1967). The Methodology of Evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation Chicago (pp. 39-83). Rand McNally.
Djemari M. Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Nontes (Yogyakarta: Metra Cendekia), 2008.
“Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools” Board dated August 27, 2020. (Accessed: 02 Fab. 2023). https://nis.edu.kz/Diana/npa/eng/CB_Model_NIS
Fang Yuqi, Kassymova G.K., Begimbetova G.A. How to improve the pre-school program? In the Case of China. Challenges of Science. Issue V, 2022, pp. 17-24. https://doi.org/10.31643/2022.03
Pratama H., Azman M., Zakaria N., & Khairudin, M. The effectiveness of the kit portable PLC on electrical motors course among vocational school students in Aceh, Indonesia. Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra = Complex Use of Mineral Resources, 2022, 320(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.31643/2022/6445.09
Kenzhebaeva A.T., Sansyzbaeva D.B., Kassymova G.K. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie usloviia formirovaniia mezhkulturnoikompetencii u studentov [Psychological and Pedagogical Conditions for the Formation of Intercultural Competence in Students] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. 2022. – No1 (123), pp. 92–101. https://doi.org/10.47526/2022-1/2664-0686.08
Brookhart S.M., & Nitko A.J. (2019). Educational assessment of students (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson
Asriadi A.M., Sulaiman Helmi, Kassymova G.K., Retnawati H., Samsul Hadi; Edi Istiyono (2022). Effect of Job Satisfaction on Service Quality mediated by Lecturer Performance at State Universities. Challenges of Science. Issue V, 2022, pp. 62-71. https://doi.org/10.31643/2022.08
Alisa Fikriyah, Kassymova G.K., Novita Nurbaiti, & Retnawati H. (2022 Use of technology in high school: A systematic review. Challenges of Science. Issue V, 2022, pp. 109-114. https://doi.org/10.31643/2022.14
Kenzhaliyev O.B., Ilmaliyev Z.B., Tsekhovoy A.F., Triyono M.B., Kassymova G.K., Alibekova G.Zh., Tayauova G.Zh. Conditions to facilitate commercialization of R & D in case of Kazakhstan, Technology in Society 67, 2021, 101792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101792
