Linguistic Basics of the Formation of Students’ Pragmatic Competence
22 42
Keywords:
language competence, pragmatic competence, critical thinking, students, Kazakh language, sections of linguistics, pragmatics.Abstract
This article discusses the linguistic foundations of the formation of pragmatic competence of students. A review of the history of the formation and study of the term “pragmatic competence” is provided. Similar and related terms with this term are also analyzed, as well as the views and conclusions of domestic and foreign linguists, methodologists, and scholars. To develop a methodology for the formation of pragmatic competence of students, it is crucial to find out its theoretical and methodological foundations; therefore the purpose of this article is to identify the linguistic features of this issue.
It is known that the indicator of the personal quality of schoolchildren is equivalent to the indicator of their socialization. The totality of the knowledge, skills, and abilities formed in a child will have a significant influence on their correct and appropriate socialization within their environment in the future. The existence of a close relationship between linguistic, communicative, and pragmatic competencies requires the use of complex methods in solving their common tasks.
The study found that the concept of competence has been studied from different perspectives. The main characteristics and indicators of pragmatic competence are established, as well as the concepts of their manifestations in the language environment are presented.
The influence of new trends in the field of linguistics on the formation of pragmatic competence is also considered. Several methods that can be used when teaching the Kazakh language are examined. An attempt has been made to find language solutions that contribute to the development of pragmatic competence.
References
Тоқаев Қ. Тәуелсіздік бәрінен де қымбат. [Электронды ресурс]. URL: https://egemen.kz/article/260146-tauelsizdik-barinen-qymbat (қаралған уақыты: 12.04.2023)
Хомский Н. Аспекты теории синтаксиса / пер. В.А. Звегинцева. – М.: Издательство Московского университета, 1972. – 129 с.
Тіл білімі терминдерінің сөздігі. – Алматы: «Фирма «Орнак» ЖШС, 2012. – 388 б.
Аймауытов Ж. Алты томдық шығармалар жинағы. Т. 4. Психология, жан жүйесі және өнер таңдау. – Алматы: Ел-шежіре, 2013. – 384 б.
Байтұрсынұлы А. Қазақ тіл білімінің мәселелері / Құраст. Ғ. Әнес. – Алматы: Абзал-Ай, 2013. – 640 б.
Тұңғышбаева Ғ.Ж. «Прагматика» ұғымының мағынасы мен қолданылуы аясы // ҚазҰУ хабаршысы. Филология сериясы. – 2010. – №6 (130). – Б. 120–123.
Сафонова В.В. Культуроведение в системе современного языкового образования // Иностранные языки в школе. – 2001. – №3. – С. 17–24.
Тер-Минасова С.Г. Тіл және мәдениетаралық коммуникация. ‒ Алматы: Ұлттық аударма бюросы, 2018. – 320 б. 9. Щукин А.Н. Обучение иностранным языкам: теория и практика: учебное пособие. – М.: Филоматис, 2010. – 475 с.
Старостина Е.И. Сущность и содержание понятия прагматической компетенции, ее роль в процессе изучения русского языка как иностранного. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://api-mag.kursksu.ru/media/pdf/007-20.pdf (дата обращения: 08.05.2023)
Полунина Л.Н. Функциональные компоненты прагмтической компетенции и их роль в развитии коммуникативных умений студентов высших учебных заведений в процессе обучения английскому языку // Педагогика. Вопросы теории и практики. – 2020. – Том 5. Выпуск 6. – С. 792–797.
Комарова З.И. Коммуникативно-прагматическая парадигма в дисциплинарно-методологическом пространстве современной лингвистики // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. Филология. Искусствоведение. – 2013. – №1 (292). – С. 66–71.
Оразбаева Ф., Дәулетбекова Ж. Коммуникативтік-прагматикалық парадигма: айтылым мәдениетін қалыптастырудың маңызы мен мүмкіндіктері // ҚазҰУ Хабаршысы: Филология сериясы. – 2021. – №3 (183). – Б. 43–49. 14. Дәулетбекова Ж.Т. Сөз мәдениеті – тілдік білім нәтижесі: монография. – Алматы: Ғылым мен білім интеграциясы институты, 2017. – 240 б.
Mao T., He Sh. An Integrated Approach to Pragmatic Competence: Its Framework and Properties // Sage Open. – 2021. – Т. 11. – №2. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211011472
House J. Developing pragmatic competence in English as a lingua franca: Using discourse markers to express (inter)subjectivity and connectivity // Journal of pragmatics. – 2013. – Т. 59. – С. 57–67 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.001
REFERENCES
Toqaev Q. Tauelsіzdіk barіnen de qymbat [Independence is more precious than anything else]. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://egemen.kz/article/260146-tauelsizdik-barinen-qymbat (date of access: 12.04.2023) [in Kazakh]
Homskiy N. Aspekty teorii sintaksisa [Aspect theory syntax] / per. V.A. Zveginceva. – M.: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1972. – 129 s. [in Russian]
Tіl bіlіmі terminderіnіn sozdіgі [Dictionary of linguistic terms]. – Almaty: «Firma «Ornak» JShS, 2012. – 388 b. [in Kazakh]
Aimauytov J. Alty tomdyq shygarmalar jinagy. T. 4. Psihologia, jan juiesі jane oner tandau [A collection of works in six volumes. Vol. 4. Psychology, soul system and art choice]. – Almaty: El-shejіre, 2013. – 384 b. [in Kazakh]
Baitursynuly A. Qazaq tіl bіlіmіnіn maselelerі [Problems of Kazakh linguistics] / Qurast. G. Anes. – Almaty: Abzal-Ai, 2013. – 640 b. [in Kazakh]
Tungyshbaeva G.J. «Pragmatika» ugymynyn magynasy men qoldanylu aiasy [The meaning and scope of the concept of “pragmatics”] // QazUU habarshysy. Filologia seriasy. – 2010. – №6 (130). – B. 120–123. [in Kazakh]
Safonova V.V. Kulturovedenie v sisteme sovremennogo iazykovogo obrazovania [Cultural education in the system of modern language education] // Inostrannye iazyki v shkole. – 2001. – №3. – S. 17–24. [in Russian]
Ter-Minasova S.G. Tіl jane madenietaralyq kommunikacia [Language and intercultural communication]. ‒ Almaty: Ulttyq audarma biurosy, 2018. – 320 b. [in Kazakh]
Shukin A.N. Obuchenie inostrannym iazykam: teoria i praktika [Teaching foreign languages: theory and practice]: uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Filomatis, 2010. – 475 s. [in Russian]
Starostina E.I. Sushnost i soderjanie poniatia pragmaticheskoi kompetencii, ee rol v processe izuchenia russkogo iazyka kak inostrannogo [The essence and content of the concept of pragmatic competence, its role in the process of studying the Russian language as a foreign language]. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://api-mag.kursksu.ru/media/pdf/007-20.pdf (date of access: 08.05.2023) [in Russian]
Polunina L.N. Funkcionalnye komponenty pragmticheskoi kompetencii i ih rol v razvitii kommunikativnyh umeniy studentov vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy v processe obuchenia angliskomu iazyku [Functional components of pragmatic competence and their role in the development of communicative skills of students of higher educational institutions in the process of learning English] // Pedagogika. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. – 2020. – Tom 5. Vypusk 6. – S. 792–797. [in Russian]
Komarova Z.I. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskaia paradigma v disciplinarno-metodologicheskom prostranstve sovremennoi lingvistiki [Communicative-pragmatic paradigm in the disciplinary-methodological space of modern linguistics] // Vestnik Cheliabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologia. Iskusstvovedenie. – 2013. – №1 (292). – S. 66–71. [in Russian]
Orazbaeva F., Dauletbekova J. Kommunikativtіk-pragmatikalyq paradigma: aitylym madenietіn qalyptastyrudyn manyzy men mumkіndіkterі [Communicative-pragmatic paradigm: importance and possibilities of formation of speech culture] // QazUU Habarshysy: Filologia seriasy. – 2021. – №3 (183). – B. 43–49. [in Kazakh]
Dauletbekova J.T. Soz madenietі – tіldіk bіlіm natijesі [Word culture is the result of language education]: monografia. – Almaty: Gylym men bіlіm integraciasy instituty, 2017. – 240 b. [in Kazakh]
Mao T., He Sh. An Integrated Approach to Pragmatic Competence: Its Framework and Properties // Sage Open. – 2021. – T. 11. – №2. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211011472
House J. Developing pragmatic competence in English as a lingua franca: Using discourse markers to express (inter)subjectivity and connectivity // Journal of pragmatics. – 2013. – T. 59. – S. 57–67 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.001
