THE IMPORTANCE OF NATIONAL IDENTITY AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE IN KAZAKHSTAN
154 111
Keywords:
Nation, national identity, nationalism, youth, Kazakhstan, Kazakh people.Abstract
This study intends to explore the salience of national identity for young people from the perspective of ‘commitment and loyalty’ to their nation. The uniqueness of this study is that it provides the opportunity to observe the salience of civic, ethnic, and cultural features of national identity in Kazakhstan.
This article has examined the importance of national identity theoretically and critically reviewed the literature on this theme. For the case study, a small survey was conducted in order to evaluate the role of inclusion in shaping national identity among young students.
An academic implication of this research entails further research on the salience of belonging and sense of attachment to national identity among young people in other cosmopolitan cities of Kazakhstan, such as Almaty, Nur-Sultan and Atyrau, where the effect of globalisation is more prevalent and the Kazakh customs and traditions less noticeable in order to make a comparative evaluation.
In this context, the authors consider the importance of national identity for young individuals by analysing the theories on nations and nationalism, specifically emphasising the relation between individuals and their nations. Analysis is complemented by a short survey on the subject of national identity, which was carried out among students of the Kazakh-Turkish International University in Turkistan, Kazakhstan.
References
Fenton, S. Indifference towards national identity: What young adults think about being English and British. // Nations and Nationalism, 13 (2). – 2007. – P. 321–339.
Sharipova, D. Youth and Civic national identity. The Nazarbayev Generation: Youth in Kazakhstan. Laruelle, M (ed.). New York: Lexington Books, 2019. – P. 1–21.
Connor, W. Beyond reason: The nature of the ethno-national bond. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16 (3). – 1993. – P. 373–390.
Anderson, B. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, New York: Verso, 2006. – 256 p.
Gellner, E. Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983. – 150 p.
Thompson, A. Nations, national identities and human agency: Putting people back into nations. Sociological Review, 49 (1). – 2001. – P. 33–55.
Smith, A.D. The problem of national identity: Ancient, medieval and modern? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 17 (3). – 1994. – P. 375–399.
Brubaker, R. Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992. – 179 p. 9. Tartakovsky E. National Identity. In: Levesque R.J.R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Adolescence. Springer, New York, NY. – 2011. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1695-2_367
Calhoun, C. Nationalism. Buckingham: Open University Press. London. – 1997. – P. 162–164.
Tamir, Y. Not so civic: Is there a difference between ethnic and civic nationalism? Annual Review of Political Science, 22 (1). – 2019. – P. 1–16.
Geertz, C. Interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973. – 471 p.
Creswell, J. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. – 2003. – 342 p.
Liebkind, K. Minority identity and identification processes: A social psychological study: Maintenance and reconstruction of ethnolinguistic identity in multiple group allegiance. Helsinki: The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, 1984.
Kuzembayeva A., Nurdavletova S., Chukubayev Ye., Baikushikova G. Globalization and cultural attitudes of youth in Kazakhstan. // Global Journal of Sociology. Volume 04, Issue 2. – 2014. – P. 23–28.
Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. // Educational Researcher, 33 (7). – 2004. – P. 14–26.
Bryman, A. Social research methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. – 809 p.
