Semantic Nature of the Vocabulary of Modern Turkic Written Languages
164 126
Anahtar Kelimeler:
common Turkic language, legality, vocabulary of Turkic languages, scientific and theoretical provisions, conclusions, modern Kipchak languages.Özet
The main mechanism for the consolidation of the Turkic peoples into a superethnos
is the study of the continuity of modern Turkic languages that grew out of a single common Turkic
language, and the features of the formation of patterns inherent in each language in the context of
“language and ethnos”, “language and society”, “language and culture”. These issues will
contribute to bringing the intercultural relations of the Turkic-speaking peoples to a qualitatively
new level, preserving and promoting common Turkic language and cultural values in the context of
globalization. In this regard, the development of a theoretical substantiation of the comparatively
synchronous lexicology of the modern Kypchak and modern Oghuz languages with linguistic
expertise of scientific and theoretical provisions and conclusions related to the vocabulary of the
Turkic languages, based on the materials of the Kazakh, Nogai, Bashkir, Tatar, Kumyk, Kyrgyz,
Turkish, Azerbaijani, Gagauz, Turkmen languages is of great importance. After all, in the process
of combining conceptual scientific knowledge on individual and general issues of lexicology, a
single body of theoretical knowledge about the lexical composition of the Turkic languages will be
created, and the commonalities and differences at the current level of development of the Turkic
languages will be clearly defined. This circumstance leads to a complete study of two, three or more
Turkic languages or comparative-historical, comparative-descriptive between language groups and
language subgroups. The article reveals the semantic features of the vocabulary of modern Turkic
written languages.
Referanslar
Баскаков Н.А. Алтайская семья языков и её изучение / Институт языкознания АН СССР. – М.: Наука, 1981. –136 с.
Сыздық Р. Қазақ әдеби тілінің тарихы. – Павлодар: С.Торайғыров атындағы ПМУ, 2010. – 400 б.
Мусаев К.М. Лексикология тюркских языков. – М.: Наука, 1984. – 228 с.
Гак В.Г. Сопоставительная лексикология. – М.: Международные отношения, 1977. – 264 с.
Қазақ тілінің түсіндірме сөздігі. – Алматы: Дайк-Пресс, 2008. – 968 б. 6. Академический словарь башкирского языка: в 10 т. / под ред. Ф.Г. Хисамитдиновой. – Уфа: Китап, 2011. – Т. 1. – 432 c.
Севортян Э.В. Этимологический словарь тюркских языков: Общетюркские и межтюркские основы на гласные. – М.: Наука, 1974. – 768с.
Хисамитдинова Ф.Г. Словарь башкирской мифологии. – Уфа: ИИЯЛ УНЦ РАН, 2011. – 420 с.
Иллич-Свитыч В.М. Опыт сравнения ностратических языков: (семитохамитский, картвельский, индоевропейский, уральский): Введение. Сравнительный словарь (b-Ḳ). – М.: Наука, 1971. – Т.1. – 412 с.
Жылқыбай Г.Қ. Түркі тілдеріндегі демеуліктердің мағыналық ерекшеліктері // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2020. – №2(116). – Б.78–90.
