Yapıcı Öğrenme Yoluyla Öğretmen Adaylarının Düşünce Tasarımı Becerilerinin Oluşturulması
34 69
Anahtar Kelimeler:
future teachers, design thinking, abilities, constructive teaching, elements of design thinking.Özet
In this article, the authors draw attention to the problem of developing design thinking skills in students, in particular creativity and innovation, through constructive learning. At present, the accelerated development of science and technology is increasing the demands on humanity, as a result of which there is a need to form an intellectual, constructive personality who has developed a thinking design, that is, the mechanisms necessary to establish dialogic relationships with people must be formed, culture, civilization, capable of self-improvement, self-regulation, self-realization and the formation of one’s image. During the period of rapid development of innovations and technologies in our country, one of the most important areas is the training of future teachers in higher education institutions, and design thinking is a necessary skill for both future teachers and their future students. However, the skill of design thinking is one of the new skills that has not yet been fully explored and developed in our country. Constructive learning has been widely studied and is being studied in pedagogy. The purpose of the presented article is to analyze and discuss constructive pedagogical methods for the formation of design thinking skills among future teachers.
The article identifies the research issues of the topic, conducts an extensive analysis of sources of foreign and domestic literature, and also reflects the results of a survey conducted among students and teachers in order to determine the meaning of the concepts of “design thinking” and “constructive learning”.
The article also states that in the 2022-2023 academic year, an experimental course “Effective constructive approaches in the educational process” was tested, aimed at developing design thinking skills among students of the educational program 6B01 – “Pedagogical Sciences”, and the results obtained on the basis of quantitative methods were proposed. The course, implemented using constructive teaching methods, gave positive results, the possibility of forming design thinking skills in future teachers through constructive learning was revealed.
Referanslar
Muldagaliyeva А.A., Dosmagambetova J., Kulzhanbekova G.K. 21St Century Competences. What they are and why they are important // ҚазҰУ Хабаршысы. – 2023. – №1 (189). – Б. 203–209. https://doi.org/10.26577/EJPh.2023.v189.i1.ph21 2. Berikbol R., Sabirova L., Makarova O. Modern techniques in organizing the individual work of students-future teachers // World Journal on Educational Technology. – 2022. – Vol.14. Is.4. – P. 1163–1178. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i4.7651
Қазақстан Республикасында білім беруді және ғылымды дамытудың 2020–2025 жылдарға арналған мемлекеттік бағдарламасын бекіту туралы Қазақстан Республикасы Үкіметінің 2019 жылғы 27 желтоқсандағы №988 қаулысы [Электронды ресурс]. URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/P1900000988 (қаралған күні: 14.07.2023)
Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. International Commission on the Futures of Education [Electronic resource]. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707 (date of access: 17.07.2023)
Brown T. Design thinking // Harvard Business Review. – 2008. – Vol. 86. Is.6. – P. 84–92.
Жамелов Б.А. «Дизайн ойлау» – оқыту мен білім берудегі жаңа әдіс. [Электронды ресурс]. URL: https://bilimainasy.kz/дизайн-ойлау-оқыту-мен-білім-беруде/ (қаралған күні: 15.07.2023)
Meinel M., Eismann T.T., Fixson S.K., Voigt K.I. The weakest link: The importance of problem framing in design thinking // Research Handbook on Design Thinking. – 2023. – P. 232–245. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://surl.li/kghjo (date of access: 15.07.2023)
Соколов М.Б., Новоселов С.А. Особенности развития дизайн-мышления при подготовке магистров дизайн-образования // Профессиональное образование. – 2020. – №3. – С. 158–163.
Лихачев Б.Т. Педагогика. Курс лекций. – М.: Владос, 2016. – 244 c. 10. Hooley N. Pragmatist philosophy for critical knowledge, learning and consciousness: A new epistemological framework for education // Pragmatist Philosophy for Critical Knowledge, Learning and Consciousness: A New Epistemological Framework for Education. – London: Routledge, 2022. – 208 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003308478
Hyslop-Margison E.J., Strobel J. Constructivism and education: misunderstandings and pedagogical implications // The Teacher Educator. – 2007. – Vol. 43, Is.1. – P. 72–86. http://doi.org/10.1080/08878730701728945
Bada Dr., Olusegun S. Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning // Journal of Research and Method in Education. – 2015. – Vol. 5, Is. 6. – P. 66–70. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670
Windschitl M. Framing Constructivism in Practice as the Negotiation of Dilemmas: An Analysis of the Conceptual, Pedagogical, Cultural, and Political Challenges Facing Teachers // Review of Educational Research. – 2002. – Vol. 72, Is.2. – P. 131–175. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072002131
Jervis J., Brand J.E. The fragility of design thinking: Applying symbolic interactionism to promote shared meaning // Research Handbook on Design Thinking. – Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2023. – P. 201–219.
Jean S. MacFadyen Design Thinking // Holistic Nursing Practice. – 2014. – Vol. 28, Is.1. – P. 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000008
Asiksoy G., Ozdamli F. An overview to research on education technology based on constructivist learning approach // Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. – 2017. – Vol. 12, Is. 3. `– P. 133–147.
Spector M.J., Lin L. The sciences of learning and instructional design: Constructive articulation between communities. – New York: Routledge, 2017. – 244 p. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315684444
Pedemonte N., Madero C., Lobos C. Migration in the Classroom to the light of Multicultural Beliefs and Constructivist Teaching Practices // International Journal of Instruction. – 2023. – Vol. 16, Is. 3. – P. 855–876. http://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16346a
Matthews M. R. Changing the focus: From nature of science to features of science // Advances in nature of science research: Concepts and methodologies. – 2012. – С. 3–26. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.bu.edu/hps-scied/files/2012/10/Matthews-HPS-Changing-the-Focus-From-Nature-of-Science-to-Features-of-Science.pdf (date of access: 15.07.2023)
Сaдықовa Б.Б., Еснaзaровa Ұ.Ә., ТоқбергеновaA.A. География пәнін оқытуда оқушылардың зерттеушілік дағдыларын қалыптастырудың инновациялық әдістері мен технологиялары // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2023. – №2 (128). – Б. 301–313. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-2/2664-0686.24
Burkhalter N., Shegebayev M.R. Critical thinking as culture: Teaching post-Soviet teachers in Kazakhstan // International Review of Education. – 2012. – Vol. 58. – P. 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-012-9285-5
REFERENCES
Muldagaliyeva A.A., Dosmagambetova J., Kulzhanbekova G.K. 21St Century Competences. What they are and why they are important // QazUU Habarshysy. – 2023. – №1 (189). – B. 203–209. https://doi.org/10.26577/EJPh.2023.v189.i1.ph21
Berikbol R., Sabirova L., Makarova O. Modern techniques in organizing the individual work of students-future teachers // World Journal on Educational Technology. – 2022. – Vol.14. Is.4. – P. 1163–1178. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i4.7651
Qazaqstan Respublikasynda bіlіm berudі jane gylymdy damytudyn 2020–2025 jyldarga arnalgan memlekettіk bagdarlamasyn bekіtu turaly Qazaqstan Respublikasy Ukіmetіnіn 2019 jylgy 27 jeltoqsandagy №988 qaulysy [Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 27, 2019 No. 988 on approval of the state program for the development of education and science in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2020–2025]. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/P1900000988 (date of access: 14.07.2023) [in Kazakh]
Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. International Commission on the Futures of Education [Electronic resource]. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707 (date of access: 17.07.2023)
Brown T. Design thinking // Harvard Business Review. – 2008. – Vol. 86. Is.6. – P. 84–92.
Jamelov B.A. «Dizain oilau» – oqytu men bіlіm berudegі jana adіs [Design thinking is a new method in teaching and learning]. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://bilimainasy.kz/dizajn-ojlau-oқytu-men-bіlіm-berude/ (date of access: 15.07.2023)
Meinel M., Eismann T.T., Fixson S.K., Voigt K.I. The weakest link: The importance of problem framing in design thinking // Research Handbook on Design Thinking. – 2023. – P. 232–245. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://surl.li/kghjo (date of access: 15.07.2023)
Sokolov M.B., Novoselov S.A. Osobennosti razvitia dizain-myshlenia pri podgotovke magistrov dizain-obrazovania [Features of the development of design thinking in the preparation of masters of design education, Professional education] // Professionalnoe obrazovanie. – 2020. – №3. – S. 158–163. [in Russian]
Lihachev B.T. Pedagogika. Kurs lekcii [Pedagogy. Lecture Course]. – M.: Vlados, 2016. – 244 c. [in Russian]
Hooley N. Pragmatist philosophy for critical knowledge, learning and consciousness: A new epis-temological framework for education // Pragmatist Philosophy for Critical Knowledge, Learning and Consciousness: A New Epistemological Framework for Education. – London: Routledge, 2022. – 208 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003308478
Hyslop-Margison E.J., Strobel J. Constructivism and education: misunderstandings and pedagogical implications // The Teacher Educator. – 2007. – Vol. 43, Is.1. – P. 72–86. http://doi.org/10.1080/08878730701728945
Bada Dr., Olusegun S. Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning // Journal of Research and Method in Education. – 2015. – Vol. 5, Is. 6. – P. 66–70. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670
Windschitl M. Framing Constructivism in Practice as the Negotiation of Dilemmas: An Analysis of the Conceptual, Pedagogical, Cultural, and Political Challenges Facing Teachers // Review of Educational Research. – 2002. – Vol. 72, Is.2. – P. 131–175. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072002131
Jervis J., Brand J.E. The fragility of design thinking: Applying symbolic interactionism to promote shared meaning // Research Handbook on Design Thinking. – Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2023. – P. 201–219.
Jean S. MacFadyen Design Thinking // Holistic Nursing Practice. – 2014. – Vol. 28, Is.1. – P. 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000008
Asiksoy G., Ozdamli F. An overview to research on education technology based on constructivist learning approach // Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. – 2017. – Vol. 12, Is. 3. `– P. 133–147.
Spector M.J., Lin L. The sciences of learning and instructional design: Constructive articulation between communities. – New York: Routledge, 2017. – 244 p. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315684444
Pedemonte N., Madero C., Lobos C. Migration in the Classroom to the light of Multicultural Beliefs and Constructivist Teaching Practices // International Journal of Instruction. – 2023. – Vol. 16, Is. 3. – P. 855–876. http://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16346a
Matthews M. R. Changing the focus: From nature of science to features of science // Advances in nature of science research: Concepts and methodologies. – 2012. – S. 3–26. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.bu.edu/hps-scied/files/2012/10/Matthews-HPS-Changing-the-Focus-From-Nature-of-Science-to-Features-of-Science.pdf (date of access: 15.07.2023)
Sadyqova B.B., Esnazarova U.A., Toqbergenova A.A. Geografia panіn oqytuda oqushylardyn zertteushіlіk dagdylaryn qalyptastyrudyn innovacialyq adіsterі men tehnologialary [Innovative Methods and Technologies for the Formation of Research Skills of Students in Teaching Geography] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2023. – №2 (128). – B. 301–313. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-2/2664-0686.24 [in Kazakh]
Burkhalter N., Shegebayev M.R. Critical thinking as culture: Teaching post-Soviet teachers in Kazakhstan // International Review of Education. – 2012. – Vol. 58. – P. 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-012-9285-5
