Dilsel Kişilik Alanındaki "Ruh" Kavramının Alaka Düzeyi ve Kapsamı (Ş. Murtaza’nın Çalışmasına Göre)
40 66
Anahtar Kelimeler:
Spirit, character, linguistics, linguoculturology, conceptology, literature, art, culture, history, nation, character, philosophy.Özet
Currently, the scientific direction of conceptuology is one of the most studied topics in Kazakh linguistics, like linguoculturology, anthropocentric linguistics. The main research goals of these three areas are very similar because in all these moments language is closely connected with the human factor.
This article examines the concept of «Spirit» in the works of the outstanding Kazakh writer and public figure Sherkhan Murtaza. The author demonstrates the versatility of this concept and its significance in his work.
The aim of the article is to analyse how the concept of «Spirit» takes on different semantic shades and subtexts in the literary works of a linguistic personality and to what extent and how it influences the development of the plot and the features of the characters.
In Kazakh linguistics, reality is a linguistic image of the universe that represents a body of knowledge about the existence. In this context, it is known that each language has concepts that reflect its unique features. The main objective of the article is to determine what informative and cultural shades the concept of «Spirit» takes on in the works of the linguistic personality that becomes the subject of research. More precisely, in this present article we have analysed the scope of application of the concept «Spirit» in the author’s country-specific worldview.
The research article raises the question of the connection of the concept «Spirit» with human national identity, art, language, nature and spirituality and focuses on how Sherkhan Murtaza uses this term to express the history and culture of Kazakhstan.
The scientific and practical significance of the article lies in analysing the inner world of the heroes and defining the concept of «Spirit» in their spiritual quest. In the world of science, the term «concept» is one of the most important terms not only in linguistics, but also in such branches of fundamental science as philosophy and psychology. In this regard, the study of the concept of «Spirit» in the work of Sherkhan Murtaza should reveal its figurative side in the creation of the human soul and his own skill as a philosopher, as well as the importance of this subject within the framework of linguistic, literary and cultural discussions.
The artistic works of Sh. Murtaza were used as research material.
The article can be used as a supplement for literary scholars and linguists.
Referanslar
ПАЙДАЛАНЫЛҒАН ӘДЕБИЕТТЕР ТІЗІМІ
Шалбаева А. Жақсылық пен жамандық концептілерінің танымдық көрінісі: филол. ғыл. док. ... автореф. – Алматы, 2010. – 31 б.
Марков Д. Проблемы теории социалистического реализма. – М.: Художественная литература, 1978. – 413 c.
Есинбаева Ж. Ғылыми-көпшiлiк стиль: дискурстық, тiлдiк-стильдiк талдау: филол. ғыл. канд. ... дисс. – Алматы, 2009. – 178 б.
Лосев А.Ф. Проблема символа и реалистическое искусство. – М.: Искусство, 1976. – 367 с.
Шукшин В. Вопросы самому себе. – М.: Молодая гвардия, 1977. – 387 с.
Манкеева Ж.А. Мәдени лексиканың ұлттық сипаты. – Алматы: Fылым, 1997. – 272 б.
Нерознак В.П. Теория словестности старая и новая парадигмы / Русская словесность. От теории словесности к структуре текста. Антология / Под общ. ред В.П. Нерознака. – М.: Академия, 1997. – 320 с.
Майтанов Б. Қазақ прозасындағы замандас бейнесі. – Алматы: Ғылым, 1982. – 148 б.
Күштаева М.Т. «Тары» концептісінің семантикалық құрылымы мен лингвомәдени мазмұны: филол. ғыл. канд. ... автореф. – Алматы, 2005. – 24 б.
Мұртаза Ш. Ай мен Айша: Роман-дилогия. – Астана: Елорда, 2000. – 393 б.
Әбдезұлы Қ. Тарих және тағдыр. – Алматы: Қазығұрт, 2004. – 434 б.
Смагулова Г.Н. Мағыналас фразеологизмдердің ұлттық-мәдени аспектілері. – Алматы: Білім, 1998. – 196 б.
Оразбек М. Көркем прозадағы шығармашылық тұлға мен авторлық позициясының арақатынасы (1980-2000 жылдар бойынша): филол. ғыл. канд. ... автореф. – Алматы, 2007. – 42 б.
Қожахмет А.Қ., Хусаинова Л.М. Лингвистикалық зерттеулердегі мәтін және дискурс теориясы // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2023. – №2 (128). – Б. 178–189. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-2/2664-0686.14
REFERENCES
Shalbayeva A. Jaksylyk pen jamandyk konceptilerinin tanymdyk korinisi: filol. gyl. dok. ... avtoref. [Cognitive reflection of the concepts of good and evil: abstract]. – Almaty, 2010. – 31 b. [in Kazakh]
Markov D. Problemy teorii sotcialisticheskogo realizma [Problems of the theory of Socialist realism]. – M.: Hudojestvennaia literatura, 1978. – 413 s. [in Russian]
Esinbaeva J. Gylymi-kopshilik stil: diskurstyq, tildik-stildik taldau: filol. gyl. kand. ... diss. [Popular science style: discursive, language-style analysis: diss.]. – Almaty, 2009. – 178 b. [in Kazakh]
Losev A. F. Problema simvola i realisticheskogo iskusstva [The symbol problem and realistic art]. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1976. – 367 s. [in Russian]
Shukshin V. Voprosy samomu sebe [Questions to yourself]. – M.: Molodaia gvardia, 1977. – 387 s. [in Russian]
Mankeeva J. Madeni leksikanin ulttyq sipaty [National character of cultural vocabulary]. – Almaty: Gylym, 1997. – 272 b. [in Kazakh]
Neroznak V. P. Teoria slovestnosti staraia i novaia paradigmy. Russkaia slovestnost. Ot teorii slovestnosti k structure teksta. Antologia [The theory of literature old and new paradigms / Russian literature. From the theory of literature to the structure of the text. Anthology] / Pod obsh. red V.P. Neroznaka. – M.: Akademia, 1997. – 320 s. [in Russian]
Maitanov B. Kazakh prozasyndagy zamandas beinesi [The image of a contemporary in Kazakh prose]. – Almaty: Gylym, 1982. – 148 b. [in Kazakh]
Kushtaeva M.T. Tary konceptisinin semanticalyc kurylymy lingvomadeni mazmuny: fil. gyl. kand. … aftoref. [Semantic structure and linguocultural content of the concept of “millet”: abstract]. – Almaty, 2005. – 24 b. [in Kazakh]
Murtaza Sh. Ai men Aisha: roman-dilogia [The moon and Aisha: a novel-dilogy]. – Astana: Elorda, 2000. – 393 b. [in Kazakh]
Abdezuly K. Tarih jane tagdyr [History and fate]. – Almaty: Kazygurt. 2004. – 434 b. [in Kazakh]
Smagulova G.N. Magynalas frazeologizmderdin ulttyq-madeni aspektileri [National and cultural aspects of semantic phraseology]. – Almaty: Bilim, 1998. – 196 b. [in Kazakh]
Orazbek M. Korkem prozadagy shygarmashylyq tulga jane aftorlyq poziciasynyn araqatynasy (1980–2000 jyldar boiynsha): filol. gyl. kand. ... avtoref. [The ratio of creative personality and author's position in artistic prose (by 1980–2000): abstract]. – Almaty, 2007. – 42 b. [in Kazakh]
Kojahmet A.K., Husainova L.M. Lingvistikalyq zertteulerdegi matin jane diskurs teoriasy [Text and discourse theory in linguistic research] // Iassaui universitetinin habarshysy. – 2023. – №2 (128). – B. 178–189. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-2/2664-0686.14 [in Kazakh]
