Kapsayıcı Eğitimde Cebir Öğretiminde Etkili Teknolojiler
110 168
Anahtar Kelimeler:
learner with disabilities, inclusive education, level-based education, collective education, individual education, game technologies.Özet
Teaching mathematics in the context of inclusive education is currently a major challenge for teachers. In this article, based on practical exercises, a set of inclusive educational technologies, methods, and techniques which necessary to obtain high quality, effective and affordable education for learners with disabilities is defined. Comparing the conditions of inclusive education in the USA, Turkey and Kazakhstan, obstacles were identified, and proposals were developed for their solution. While conducting experimental lessons, the methods and technologies used in teaching are analyzed, and effective teaching when level-based teaching, collective teaching, individual teaching, and game technologies are established. Effective and ineffective moments were identified and presented in the form of tables based on the using these technologies in the classroom. As guidelines for each technology, standard tasks were created. It was noted that all the above teaching technologies contribute to the perception of educational material by learners with disabilities, including their active participation in cognitive and educational activities. To achieve this goal, it is necessary that the project and plan of each lesson in an inclusive class be developed in advance according to organizational and pedagogical inclusive technologies, considering the characteristics of learners in consultation with a subject teacher, methodologist, and leader.
Referanslar
Buchner T., Shevlin M., Donovan M.A., Gercke M., Goll H., Šiška J., Corby D. Same progress for all? Inclusive education, the United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and students with intellectual disability in European countries // Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. – 2021. – №1(18). – P. 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12368
Kauffman J.M., Ahrbeck B., Anastasiou D., Badar J., Felder M., Hallenbeck B.A. Special education policy prospects: Lessons from social policies past // Exceptionality. – 2021. – №1(29). – P. 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727326
Megan M. Inclusive Education in the United States: Middle school general Education teachers' approaches to inclusion // International Journal of Instruction. – 2014. – №2(7). – P. 5–20. International Journal of Instruction (ed.gov)
Margaret E.K., Melissa C.J., Brawand A. Co-teaching perspectives from middle school algebra co-teachers and their students with and without disabilities // International Journal of Inclusive Education. – 2020. – №4(24). – P. 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1465134
Huang X., Zhang J., Hudson L. Impact of math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and growth mindset on math and science career interest for middle school students: the gender moderating effect // European Journal of Psychology of Education. – 2019. – №3(34). – P. 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0403-z
Bone E.K., Bouck E.C., Satsangi R. Comparing concrete and virtual manipulatives to teach algebra to middle school students with disabilities // Exceptionality. – 2023. – №3(31). – P.1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2021.1938057
Katitas S., Coskun B. What is mean by inclusive education? Perceptions of Turkish teachers towards inclusive education // World Journal of Education. – 2020. – №5(10). – P. 18–28. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v10n5p18
Aktan O. Teachers' Opinions towards Inclusive Education Interventions in Turkey // Anatolian Journal of Education. – 2021. – №1(6). – P. 29–50. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2021.613a
Ozdemir S., Kilic Y. Investigating special education teachers’ views on Mathematics instruction process: Sugesstions for sustainable special Education in Mathematics instruction // Sustainability. – 2023. – №4(15). – P. 3584-1–3584-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043584
Özgüç S.C. Improving special education and inclusion course in primary mathematics teacher education program // Journal of Qualitative Research in Education. – 2021. – №25. – P. 156–182. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.28.7
Agavelyan R.O., Aubakirova S.D., Zhomartova A.D., Burdina E.I. Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education in Kazakhstan // Интеграция образования. – 2020. – №1(24). – P. 8–19. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.098.024.202001.008-019
Makoelle T.M. Schools’ transition toward inclusive education in post-soviet countries: Selected cases in Kazakhstan // SAGE Open. – 2020. – №2(10). – P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020926586
Турлубекова М.Б., Бугубаева Р.О. Инклюзивное образование в Казахстане: анализ процесса организации и возможности дальнейшего его развития // Central Asian Economic Review. – 2021. – №3(138). – С. 89–109. https://doi.org/10.52821/2224-5561-2021-3-89-109
Ахметжанова К.О. Проблемы обучения математике детей с особыми потребностями // Информационно-коммуникационные технологии в педагогическом образовании. – 2019. – №5(62). – С. 1–4. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38028377
Исабаева А.С., Садыкова А.А., Керимбекова Ж.У., Абдукаримова Ұ.А. Қазақстан Республикасында инклюзивті білім беру ерекшеліктері // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2019. – №2(112). – Б. 59–70.
Салгараева Г.И., Маханова А.С. Информатика пәнін оқытуда инклюзивті білім беру процесін ұйымдастыру формалары // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2022. – №4(126). – Б. 258–271. https://doi.org/10.47526/2022-4/2664-0686.22
Унт И. Индивидуализация и дифференциация обучения. – М.: Педагогика, 1990. – 192 с.
REFERENCES
Buchner T., Shevlin M., Donovan M.A., Gercke M., Goll H., Šiška J., Corby D. Same progress for all? Inclusive education, the United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and students with intellectual disability in European countries // Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. – 2021. – №1(18). – P. 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12368
Kauffman J.M., Ahrbeck B., Anastasiou D., Badar J., Felder M., Hallenbeck B.A. Special education policy prospects: Lessons from social policies past // Exceptionality. – 2021. – №1(29). – P. 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727326
Megan M. Inclusive Education in the United States: Middle school general Education teachers' approaches to inclusion // International Journal of Instruction. – 2014. – №2(7). – P. 5–20. International Journal of Instruction (ed.gov)
Margaret E.K., Melissa C.J., Brawand A. Co-teaching perspectives from middle school algebra co-teachers and their students with and without disabilities // International Journal of Inclusive Education. – 2020. – №4(24). – P. 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1465134
Huang X., Zhang J., Hudson L. Impact of math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and growth mindset on math and science career interest for middle school students: the gender moderating effect // European Journal of Psychology of Education. – 2019. – №3(34). – P. – 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0403-z
Bone E.K., Bouck E.C., Satsangi R. Comparing concrete and virtual manipulatives to teach algebra to middle school students with disabilities // Exceptionality. – 2023. – №1(31). – P. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2021.1938057
Katitas S., Coskun B. What is mean by inclusive education? Perceptions of Turkish teachers towards inclusive education // World Journal of Education. – 2020. – №5(10). – P. 18–28. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v10n5p18
Aktan O. Teachers' Opinions towards Inclusive Education Interventions in Turkey // Anatolian Journal of Education. – 2021. – №1(6). – P. 29–50. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2021.613a
Ozdemir S., Kilic Y. Investigating special education teachers’ views on Mathematics instruction process: Sugesstions for sustainable special Education in Mathematics instruction // Sustainability. – 2023. – №4(15). – P. 3584-1–3584-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043584
Özgüç S.C. Improving special education and inclusion course in primary mathematics teacher education program // Journal of Qualitative Research in Education. – 2021. – №25. – P. 156–182. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.28.7
Agavelyan R.O., Aubakirova S.D., Zhomartova A.D., Burdina E.I. Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education in Kazakhstan // Integracia obrazovania. – 2020. – №1(24). – S. 8–19. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.098.024.202001.008-019
Makoelle T.M. Schools’ transition toward inclusive education in post-soviet countries: Selected cases in Kazakhstan // SAGE Open. – 2020. – №2(10). – P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020926586
Turlubekova M.B., Bugubaeva R.O. Inkliuzivnoe obrazovanie v Kazahstane: analiz processa organizacii i vozmojnosti dalneishego ego razvitia [Inclusive education in Kazakhstan: Analysis of the organizing process and the possibility of its further development] // Central Asian Economic Review. – 2021. – №3(138). – S. 89–109. https://doi.org/10.52821/2224-5561-2021-3-89-109 [in Russian]
Ahmetzhanova K.O. Problemy obuchenia matematike detei s osobymi potrebnostiami [Problems of teaching mathematics for children with special needs] // Informacionno-kommunikacionnye tehnologii v pedagogicheskom obrazovanii – 2019. – №5(62). – S. 1–4. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38028377 [in Russian]
Isabaeva A.S., Sadykova A.A., Kerimbekova J.U., Abdukarimova U.A. Kazahstan Respublikasynda inkliuzivtі bіlіm beru erekshelіkterі [Features of inclusive education in the republic of Kazakhstan] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2019. – №2(112). – B. 59–70. [in Kazakh]
Salgaraeva G.I., Mahanova A.S. Informatika panіn oqytuda inkliuzivtі bіlіm beru procesіn uiymdastyru formalary [The Forms of organization of an Inclusive Educational process for teaching Computer Science] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2022. – №4(126). – B. 258–271. [in Kazakh] https://doi.org/10.47526/2022-4/2664-0686.22
Unt I. Individualizacia i differenciacia obuchenia [Individualization and differentiation of learning]. – M.: Pedagogika, 1990. – 192 s. [in Russian]
