INDIVIDUALITY OF WORD USE IN MARKHABAT BAIGUT'S PROSE
81 78
Anahtar Kelimeler:
literary style, author's narrative, character’s speech, language skills, author's neologism, linguistic usage.Özet
The article shows the artistic purpose and aesthetic, cognitive functions of the use of dialect, obsolete words and neologisms (author's neologisms) in Markhabat Baigut’s works, and their specific stylistic features are determined by examples. On the basis of the writer's works, the place of language usages, which are the subject of research, in the general Kazakh literature and writer's creativity is determined. Markhabat Baigut often talks about his characters not because of their origin, wealth, or career, but because of their morality, conscience, spiritual and moral harmony, individual qualities, and character traits.
This is a unique aspect of the writer's skill. The writer skillfully and comprehensively uses the lexical wealth of the common language. It is proven that the writer used dialect words to describe people's living conditions, to show more clearly the spiritual and cultural skills unique to a certain region, and to depict the true nature of ordinary people. During the analysis of the old words used by the writer, who found a shortcut to convey the truth to his students without any coloring, in detail, in natural state, the credo of the author is revealed, which glorifies the national value and supports the renewal of the old.
The meanings of historical and archaic words with a predominant stylistic color are revealed, and their artistic function and content load are analyzed. Apart from the neologisms that entered our language with the breath of the times, the order of use and expressive tone of author's new words are described in a broad way. As a result, it is proved that the lexical groups found in the language of the character, in the author's narrative, play an important role in explaining the individual characteristics of the master’s style.
Referanslar
Әдебиеттану / Құраст. Ә. Дайырова, Қ. Бітібаева, С. Мақпыров, Г. Құрманбаева. – Алматы: Рауан, 1997. – 269 б.
Еңсебаева К.К. Көркем мәтін және кейіпкер тілі: монография. – Өскемен: С. Аманжолов атындағы ШҚМУ баспасы, 2012. – 156 б.
Мaрхaбaт мyзacы. Әңгімecі рoмaн жүгін aрқaлaп. Әдeби-cын мaқaлaлaр, рeцeнзиялaр, эcceлeр / Құраст. А. Асанқызы. – Aлмaты: Қaзығұрт, 2020. – 344 б.
Сыздық Р. Сөз құдіреті. – Алматы: Атамұра, 2005. – 272 б.
Бaйғұт М. Бұлa бұлaқ. Әңгімeлeр. – Aлмaты: Рaритeт, 2012. –384 б.
Байғұт М. Оқу залы. Әңгімелер. – Алматы: ҚазАқпарат, 2009. – 344 б.
Бaйғұт М. Шығaрмaлaр жинaғы. І тoм. Әңгімeлeр мeн хикaяттaр. – Aлмaты: Кeрeмeт мeдиa, 2019. – 400 б.
Ергөбек Қ. Қарасөз. Қазақ прозасы туралы ойлар. – Алматы: Ел-шежіре, 2013. – 600 б.
Қайдаров Ә. Шығарма тілі – көркем әдебиет өзегі // Өнер алды – қызыл тіл. Мақалалар жинағы. – Алматы: Ғылым, 1986. – 350 б.
Байғұт М. Қозапая. Әңгімелер мен повестер. – Алматы: Атамұра, 2003. – 248 б.
Құланова С.Ш. М. Байғұт прозасындағы ұлттық идея және кейіпкер әлемі: Филол. ғыл. канд. ... дисс. – Алматы, 2010. – 120 б.
Аймұхамбет Ж.Ә., Құрмамбаева Қ.С., Миразова М.Н. Көркем туындыдағы бейне мен таңбаның қызметі // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2023. – №1(127). – Б. 35–45. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-1/2664-0686.03
Байғұт М. Алмағайып: Әңгімелер. – Алматы: Жазушы, 2001. – 199 б.
Серғалиев М. Көркем әдебиет тілі. Монографиялар. Мақалалар. Баяндамалар. – Астана: Л.Н. Гумилев атындағы ЕҰУ, 2006. – 396 б.
Гумбольдт В. Избранные труды по языкознанию. 2-е изд. – М.: Прогресс, 2000. – 400 с.
Әдебиеттану. Терминдер сөздігі. – Алматы: Ана тілі, 1998. – 384 б.
REFERENCES
Adebiettanu [Literary studies] / Qurast. A. Daiyrova, Q. Bitibaeva, S. Maqpyrov, G. Qurmanbaeva. – Almaty: Rauan, 1997. – 269 b. [in Kazakh]
Ensebaeva K.K. Korkem matin jane keiipker tili [Artistic text and character language: monograph]. – Oskemen: S. Amanjolov atyndagy ShQMU baspasy, 2012. – 156 b. [in Kazakh]
Marhabat muzasy. Angimesi roman jugin arqalap [Markhabat’s muse. The narrator talks about the novel]. Adebi-syn maqalalar, resenzialar, esseler / Qurast. A. Asanqyzy.– Almaty: Qazygurt, 2020. – 344 b. [in Kazakh]
Syzdyq R. Soz qudireti [The power of words]. – Almaty: Atamura, 2005. – 272 b. [in Kazakh]
Baigut M. Bula bulaq [Streaming spring]. Angimeler. – Almaty: Raritet, 2012. –384 b. [in Kazakh]
Baigut M. Oqu zaly [Study hall]. Angimeler. – Almaty: QazAqparat, 2009. – 344 b. [in Kazakh]
Baigut M. Shygarmalar jinagy [Collection of Works]. І tom: Angimeler men hikaiattar.– Almaty: Keremet media, 2019. – 400 b. [in Kazakh]
Ergobek Q. Qarasoz [Book of words]. Qazaq prozasy turaly oilar. – Almaty: El-shejire, 2013. – 600 b. [in Kazakh]
Qaidarov A. Shygarma tili – korkem adebiet ozegi [The language of creation is the core of fiction] // Oner aldy – qyzyl til. Maqalalar jınagy. – Almaty: Gylym, 1986. – 350 b. [in Kazakh]
Baigut M. Qozapaia [Kozapaya]. Angimeler men povester. – Almaty: Atamura, 2003. – 248 b. [in Kazakh]
Qulanova S.Sh. M. Baigut prozasyndagy ulttyq ideia jane keiipker alemi: filol. gyl. kand. ... dıss. [The national idea and the characters world in M. Baigut's prose: diss. … Kand. Philol. Science]. – Almaty, 2010. – 120 b. [in Kazakh]
Aimuhambet J.A., Qurmambaeva Q.S., Mirazova M.N. Korkem tuyndydagy beine men tanbanyn qyzmeti [The Role of Image and Sign in a Artwork] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2023. – №1(127). – B. 35–45. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-1/2664-0686.03 [in Kazakh]
Baigut M. Almagaiyp [Almagayip]. Angimeler. – Almaty: Jazushy, 2001. – 199 b. [in Kazakh]
Sergaliev M. Korkem adebiet tili [The language of literature]. Monografialar. Maqalalar. Baiandamalar. – Astana: L.N. Gumiliev atyndagy EUU, 2006. – 396 b. [in Kazakh]
Gumboldt V. Izbrannye trudy po iazykoznaniiu [Selected works on linguistics]. 2-e izd. –M.: Progress, 2000. – 400 s. [in Russian]
Adebiettanu [Literary studies]. Terminder sozdigi. – Almaty: Ana tili, 1998. – 384 b. [in Kazakh]
