For reviewers
The process of reviewing an article for a scientific journal requires special attention, professionalism, and a deep understanding of the specific requirements of the journal. The main requirements for reviewing scientific articles include:
- Familiarization with the Material
Study the journal's theme: This will help determine if the article is suitable for publication.
Carefully read the article: At this stage, attention to the structure of the article provides a complete understanding of the content of the work.
- Structure of the Review
Introduction: Describe how well the work aligns with the journal’s goals and if it suits the target audience.
Methodology: Evaluate the accuracy and detail with which the research methods are described.
Results and Interpretation: Check the logical connection between the research results and the hypotheses, as well as the accuracy of data interpretation.
Quality of Provided Data: Assess the clarity of tables, graphs, charts, and other data.
Conclusion and Recommendations: Summarize the work and provide suggestions for improving the article or propose its rejection.
- Formulating Comments
Constructive Criticism: The review should be objective and polite. Comments should indicate the article's weaknesses and offer suggestions for correction.
Clarity: Express your remarks clearly and concisely.
- Ethics and Confidentiality
Confidentiality: Do not disclose the content of the article to third parties.
Avoid Conflict of Interest: If you have personal or professional connections with the authors, inform the journal editor.
- Recommendations Based on the Review Results
Recommendation for Publication: if the article is ready for publication with minor corrections.
Need for Revision: if the work is promising but requires improvements.
Rejection: if the article does not meet the requirements or lacks scientific significance.
Example Structure of a Review
- Review annotation (1-2 sentences about the essence and potential of the article).
- Comments on sections of the article (introduction, research methodology, analyses, results, conclusion).
- General remarks and recommendations.
- Conclusion (recommendation for publication).
These guidelines make the review process high-quality and efficient, contributing to the improvement of the journal's scientific level.
