The Strategic Importance of Biogas Technology in Sustainable Livestock Farming: Perspectives on Energy, Environment, and Rural Development
17 12
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23485551Keywords:
Sustainable livestock farming, Biogas, Anaerobic fermentation, Animal waste management, Renewable energyAbstract
Sustainable livestock farming is regarded as an important research area in terms of reducing environmental impacts, ensuring efficient resource use, and supporting rural development. In this context, biogas technology provides significant environmental and economic benefits by converting animal manure and agricultural by-products into renewable energy. The use of biogas produced through anaerobic fermentation for electricity and heat generation enables livestock enterprises to meet part of their energy needs while reducing their dependence on fossil fuels. The digestate generated as a by-product of the process can also be utilised as organic fertiliser, contributing to the recycling of nutrients in agricultural production. Thus, the conversion of waste into valuable resources, the recovery of nutrients, and improved resource efficiency enable the practical implementation of the circular economy approach. This study examines the role of biogas technology in sustainable livestock farming systems from the perspectives of energy production, reduction of environmental pressures, and economic sustainability. Particular attention is given to the contribution of biogas applications to reducing energy costs, limiting fossil fuel consumption, and utilising local renewable energy resources, particularly in small- and medium-scale livestock enterprises. In conclusion, biogas technology is considered an important tool that integrates animal waste management with energy production, supports environmental sustainability, and contributes to strengthening the economic resilience of rural communities.
References
Abid M., Wu J., Seyedsalehi M., Hu Y.-Y., & Tian G. (2021) Novel insights of impacts of solid content on high solid anaerobic digestion of cow manure: Kinetics and microbial community dynamics. Bioresource Technology, 333, 125205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125205
Agar D.A., Athanassiadis D., & Pavelka B.J. (2022) The CO2 cutting cost of biogas from humanure and livestock manure. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 53, 102381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102381
Awasthi S.K., Kumar M., Sarsaiya S., Ahluwalia V., Chen H., Kaur G., Sirohi R., Sindhu R., Binod P., Pandey A., Rathour R., Kumar S., Singh L., Zhang Z., Taherzadeh M.J., & Awasthi M.K. (2022) Multi-criteria research lines on livestock manure biorefinery development towards a circular economy: From the perspective of a life cycle assessment and business models strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341, 130862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130862
Balcioglu G., Jeswani H.K., & Azapagic A. (2022) Evaluating the environmental and economic sustainability of energy from anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks in Turkey. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 924-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.06.011
Brahmi M., Bruno B., Dhayal K.S., Esposito L., & Parziale A. (2024) From manure to megawatts: Navigating the sustainable innovation solution through biogas production from livestock waste for harnessing green energy for green economy. Heliyon, 10(14), e34504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34504
Cheng S., Lohani S.P., Rajbhandari U.S., Shrestha P., Shrees S., Bhandari R., & Jeuland M. (2024) Sustainability of large-scale commercial biogas plants in Nepal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139777
Enokida C.H., Tapparo D.C., Antes F.G., Radis Steinmetz R.L., Magrini F.E., Sophiatti I.V.M., Paesi S., & Kunz A. (2025) Anaerobic codigestion of livestock manure and agro-industrial waste in a CSTR reactor: Operational aspects, digestate characteristics, and microbial community dynamics. Renewable Energy, 238, 121865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121865
Freitas F.F., Furtado A.C., Piñas J.A.V., Venturini O.J., Barros R.M., & Lora E.E.S. (2022) Holistic life cycle assessment of a biogas-based electricity generation plant in a pig farm considering co-digestion and an additive. Energy, 261, 125340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125340
Hossain S., Akter S., Saha C.K., Reza T., Kabir K.B., & Kirtania K. (2023) A comparative life cycle assessment of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of livestock manure in Bangladesh. Waste Management, 157, 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.12.011
Khan M.U., & Ahring B.K. (2021) Improving the biogas yield of manure: Effect of pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of the recalcitrant fraction of manure. Bioresource Technology, 321, 124427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124427
Khoshnevisan, B., Duan, N., Tsapekos, P., Awasthi, M. K., Liu, Z., Mohammadi, A., Angelidaki I., Tsang D.C.W., Zhang Z., Pan J., Ma L., Aghbashlo M., Tabatabaei M., & Liu H. (2021) A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 110033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110033
Kim S., Lee C., & Kim J.Y. (2023) Effects of alkaline thermal hydrolysis on the formation of refractory compounds and energy balance of anaerobic digestion of cattle manure. Applied Energy, 342, 121097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121097
Li Y., Zhao J., Krooneman J., & Euverink G.J.W. (2021) Strategies to boost anaerobic digestion performance of cow manure: Laboratory achievements and their full-scale application potential. Science of the Total Environment, 755, 142940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142940
Liu M., Wei Y., & Leng X. (2021) Improving biogas production using additives in anaerobic digestion: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126666
Naranjo Herrera A.M., Esteves E.M.M., Mansouri M., Breuhaus P., & Morgado C.R.V. (2026) Brazilian bioenergy generation from cattle and pig manure: An economic life cycle assessment. Renewable Energy, 262, 125345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2026.125345
Obileke, K. C., Nwokolo, N., Makaka, G., Mukumba, P., & Onyeaka, H. (2021) Anaerobic digestion: Technology for biogas production as a source of renewable energy - A review. Energy & Environment, 32(2), 191-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X20923117
Rafiee A., Khalilpour K.R., Prest J., & Skryabin I. (2021) Biogas as an energy vector. Biomass and Bioenergy, 144, 105935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105935
Saka K., & Orhan M.F. (2025) Assessment of biogas-powered absorption cooling systems and biomass potential for sustainable rural development: A case study in Yenişehir, Turkiye. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 66, 105784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.105784
Samoraj M., Mironiuk M., Izydorczyk G., Witek-Krowiak A., Szopa D., Moustakas K., & Chojnacka K. (2022) The challenges and perspectives for anaerobic digestion of animal waste and fertilizer application of the digestate. Chemosphere, 295, 133799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133799
Sobhi M., Elsamahy T., Zakaria E., Gaballah M.S., Zhu F., Hu X., Zhou C., Guo J., Huo S., & Dong R. (2024) Characteristics, limitations and global regulations in the use of biogas digestate as fertilizer: A comprehensive overview. Science of the Total Environment, 957, 177855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177855
Tampio E., Laaksonen I., Rimhanen K., Honkala N., Laakso J., Soinne H., & Rasa K. (2024) Effect of manure co-digestion on methane production, carbon retention, and fertilizer value of digestate. Science of the Total Environment, 927, 172083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172083
Tehseen A., Regueiro L., Feijoo G., & González-García S. (2026) Closing the loop in agriculture: Life cycle assessment from manure to hydrogen and biofertilizer. Science of the Total Environment, 1011, 181135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.181135
Wei Y., Li Z., Ran W., Yuan H., & Li X. (2021) Performance and microbial community dynamics in anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and corn stover with different modification methods and trace element supplementation strategy. Bioresource Technology, 325, 124713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124713
Yun S., Xing T., Wang Y., Chen R., Han F., Zhang C., & Zou M. (2023) Mineral residue accelerant-enhanced anaerobic digestion of cow manure: An evaluation system of comprehensive performance. Science of the Total Environment, 858, 159840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159840
Zhou J., Zhang Y., Khoshnevisan B., & Duan N. (2021) Meta-analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of livestock manure in last decade: Identification of synergistic effect and optimization synergy range. Applied Energy, 282, 116128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116128
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Environmental Science and Green Technology, ISSN: 3080-8693
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
